The topic title for this thread stinks imo. It seems like numbers MS states aren't usually believed by some, but any numbers sony claims are automatically fact.
Where're the US figures?
The problem is that even before worrying about the 360 numbers - which, coming from Sony, would obviously be wrong - the PS2 numbers are also wrong. I'm sorry but PS2 sold 1M units WAY before PS3 ever did. Unless i can't read properly anymore. It's like Sony is downplaying the PS2 success to try and make PS3 figures look better, and that's just desperation in my opinion.
How come Sony's sold suddenly is different from Microsoft's sold?
In a previous thread, if I recall correctly, it was agreed Microsoft "sold" means those units from the warehouses to the retail. As said by scooby-dooby, for instance.
Scooby is correct MS shipped is to retail shelves....Sony shipped is from factory floor on way to warehouse for distribution later to retailer. Read page 4 of the linked PDF.Sony ships 1 million PS3s in North America Posted 1/8/2007 10:38 AM ET swapContent('firstHeader','applyHeader');By Matt Slagle, The Associated Press
In an important early look at the pivotal holiday sales season, Sony said it met its goal of shipping 1 million PlayStation 3 consoles to North America in 2006 despite ongoing production problems with the still hard-to-find video game system.
So, it's sold, not shipped. Ok? Or am I confused again
It's hilarious how MS ships 1.5 and everyone declares it the worst launch in history, MS's huge mistake, 360 selling worse than XBOX1 and all the other nonsense.
Sony puts up virtually identical numbers, and all of a sudden it's fastest selling console ever!! Proof that BR was the right choice and evidence the $600 pricepoint is not too high!
Can we pls get a change in thread title or close down thread?
It's hilarious how MS ships 1.5 and everyone declares it the worst launch in history, MS's huge mistake, 360 selling worse than XBOX1 and all the other nonsense.
Sony puts up virtually identical numbers, and all of a sudden it's fastest selling console ever!! Proof that BR was the right choice and evidence the $600 pricepoint is not too high!
Not everyone is interested in shipping numbers... except for this time, since so many are saying Sony can't produce enough PS3 due to Blu-ray, I take more interest in it.
Remind me again what Sony's initial target's were for CY 2006? 4 million? Sure seems as though they couldn't produce enough BR diodes...
How many consoles you sell at launch is all about production ability, not demand. The PS2 did not have this kind of availability AFAIK.
The reason that people are concerned about PS3 sales is that with fairly widespread availability now, the pent-up demand has already dissipated, and higher supply probably wouldn't have sold more consoles. This past month XBox 360 had no pent-up demand because it's been out a year already, yet its sales still matched or exceeded the PS3's.
True, PS3 is only available in NA and Japan right now, but it's still almost shocking.
I believe you are right.
I also think that to reach that 4 mil estimate, they mentioned about 1 - 1.2 mil per month production rate (2 months for stock piling and then Nov + Dec each contributing 1 mil). *If* they hit that production rate today, they should be fine (as in producing enough to start)... but the cycle has been time-shifted due to late start.
Of course, Sony would want to make more for other standalone players soon.
Well they're not exactly 'fine' as they've missed the holiday season. It's all well and good to pump our 4million units in the next 3 months, but they will not sell at the same rate as they would have in Nov and Dec. I'm not trying to be argumentative, but it's annoying to see these events painted as a positive.
As for standalone's, I read an article today that said a mere 25,000 BR standalones have been sold, so it seems that's an extremely marginal factor at this point in time.
But the point is Sony seem to have ramped up their production to close to their initial targets (amidst all the noise).
It's important because those "few" players probably sell at a high price, which means better margin for Sony and other Blu-ray manufacturers in the long push for a standard format (If there's going to be one). Over time, these standalones may be cheaper to make too.
If these are the hard core HD fans, they may also buy more BR discs than most people.
About 695,000 consumers own either a Blu-ray or an HD-DVD player, according to Tom Adams of Adams Media Research in Carmel, Calif. But only about 25,000 have purchased stand-alone Blu-ray players. Another 400,000 consumers have Blu-ray because they bought a Sony PS3 game console. Meanwhile, about 120,000 or so have a stand-alone HD-DVD player while about 150,000 have an HD-DVD upgrade kit for their Xbox 360 game consoles, Mr. Adams says. He adds that those numbers are well in excess of the 300,000 DVD-player sales in 1997, when that technology rolled out.
It was:Remind me again what Sony's initial target's were for CY 2006? 4 million? Sure seems as though they couldn't produce enough BR diodes...
They have? That's news to me.
Hardcore HD fans also bought the 120,000 standalone HD-DVD drives, and the 150,000 HD-DVD add-on drives for 360, so I'm not sure what your point is. Either way, it's not a signifigant factor in PS3 launch quantities. (though the 300,000 diodes used for the HD-DVD drives is a signifigant number)