Why are they trying to plug an HDMI cable into the DVI connector?
Curiously, it looks like a DP connector to me!Why are they trying to plug an HDMI cable into the DVI connector?
Wow, 51 FPS and "running out of memory"? That must be this GTX4x0 card.
You and your glitter/bling...It was the banner that got me!
Shiny sparkly!
I assumed January/February, after they knew A3 wasn't going to cut it, which is why late Q2/Q3 is best case.Was there a B1 tape out reported by anybody? When it happened?
2650*1600, 8xAA -- And the contestant, that's running out of memory is... guess who!
Doesnt bode too well for 470, from a performance perspective.http://tof.canardpc.com/view/fa615594-09b6-470a-add8-d247184c6cb8.jpg
2650*1600, 8xAA -- And the contestant, that's running out of memory is... guess who!
Doesnt bode too well for 470, from a performance perspective.
Enter 5870 2GB at $399 and 1GB drops in price.
The Catalytic is probably an inside joke.
Wasnt this the same case with the 4870? 512MB at launch and 1GB later.I'm starting to believe the 2gb eyefinity 6 was held back deliberately as a counter to the 4x0's. Just about all of the "wins" we are seeing for the 470 appear to be the result of the 5870 running out of memory.
Curiously, it looks like a DP connector to me!
Wasnt this the same case with the 4870? 512MB at launch and 1GB later.
Yes it was, the 1gb 4870 being released only 3 months after the 512mb if I recall correctly.
Is it the expectation the 5870 will now come with 2gb as standard, like the 1gb became standard with the 4870? I was sort of under the impression that the 5870 2gb would be a much lower volume part.
This is quite an interesting benchmark from AT, what ATI would give for a similar result this time around.
GTX480 power usage is "well" below 300W.
Tegra 2 is around 50 mm^2. Ion2 (aka gt218) around 60mm^2. And you'd think they'd get a bit more yield out of them than fermi...Tegra 2 and ION2 are 40nm TSMC too. I can imagine that the vaste majority from the 80% is Tegra2 and ION2 .
NV currently has 80% of TSMC's 40nm production.
So because we've decided that R870 is evolutionary and Fermi is a bigger change, that somehow absolves Nvidia from the need to execute?
Which doesn't mean they can't have problems. Same with NVIDIA. Their execution from the GeForce 6 series up to G92 was almost flawless. Still they had problems with GT200 and now the delays with Fermi.
And why do you assume that they'll always be following this strategy ? Fermi is a stepping stone for at least two generations of their products. Do you think that they will follow the same "big chip" strategy, if it doesn't work out for them ? G80 turned out to be very good, actually one of their best, if not the best. It was only with GT200 that they had "some" problems. If Fermi, in its current state isn't profitable, you can bet that they'll change their philosophy.
If you look at all the changes it was a major rework/overhaul, if not a brand new/mint fresh one. For starters, you could begin by asking yourselves where did the 40% increase in raw flops/mm2 on the same process come from?