It will certainly be interesting to revisit this thread once the next "high-end" hardware is out.serenity said:And now we see some backtracking ...
It will certainly be interesting to revisit this thread once the next "high-end" hardware is out.serenity said:And now we see some backtracking ...
well nV did still have around a 20% profit margin on the GX2, Arun and I had a disagreement about this before, and I thought they didn't have much margin, but suprisingly they did, don't know if they sold alot of them, but profits where there on a per card basis.
Thats always the case when it comes to speculation threads.It will certainly be interesting to revisit this thread once the next "high-end" hardware is out.
Although marketing can and will always argue that having high visibility for your company even if it's only one product can help sales for all of your products.
If such a card is ever released, it will be obsoleted by a single chip high-end solution within one year.
Well, good point. GPUs are getting old very fast, although 8800GTX has not been made obsolete yet . But let me explain. I perceive GX2-like cards as a stop gap solution. Note that a new architecture from NVIDIA should be coming sometime next year (if everything goes as planned). In my opinion, if we see a GX2 card in January, this new architecture will debut sooner rather than later. I would say in the first half of 2008. Thus, GX2 cards will be made obsolete very quickly.
What makes you think G92 doesn't fit your description? 8 Clusters @ 2GHz+ fits the 'close to 1TFlop' requirement just fine, as long as you weren't expecting 999GFlops... And that's not contradictory with a GX2 either, as long as it's clocked lower.As you remember M. Hara said there will be a new Highend GPU with performance close to 1Tflop in Q4. The second thing is that some guy from NVIDIA said their next-gen GPU will support double precision floating point and it will be launched by the end of year.
What makes you think G92 doesn't fit your description? 8 Clusters @ 2GHz+ fits the 'close to 1TFlop' requirement just fine, as long as you weren't expecting 999GFlops... And that's not contradictory with a GX2 either, as long as it's clocked lower.
800-900GFlops would perfectly fit within the definition of 'close', IMO. If you were expecting 975GFlops or something stupid like that, why wouldn't they just be overvolting it by 0.001V and go above 1T for marketing.That's very generous. The clock has to be far north of 2GHz to come anywhere close to 1TFlop. 2.4GHz+ is more like it.
Yeah, I think that's largely down to inventory management though.Margin of error I suppose. Personally, I won't consider the promise fulfilled at anything < 900GFlops. Might be a moot point anyway since the rumour mill is pretty quiet on that front. At least for Q4.
800-900GFlops would perfectly fit within the definition of 'close', IMO. If you were expecting 975GFlops or something stupid like that, why wouldn't they just be overvolting it by 0.001V and go above 1T for marketing.