nvidia "D8E" High End solution, what can we expect in 2008?

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by 2900guy, Nov 2, 2007.

  1. Blazkowicz

    Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2004
    Messages:
    5,607
    Likes Received:
    256
    well if there's the addition of FP64 and DX 10.1 support, that's already much more than the difference between G8x and G9x (at least the two G9x we really know, G92 and G98)
     
  2. Galduta

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,046
    Likes Received:
    7
  3. AnarchX

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    34
    To late for wish-lists, christmas is over... :wink::lol:
     
  4. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    Is that guy known for "leaks"?
    Just wondering due this in the end of the post:
    Bolding by me
     
  5. Galduta

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    I do not know Chinese language . I had problems with the translation of the page ;)
     
  6. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    Neither do I, that's Google's translation :p
     
  7. Galduta

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,046
    Likes Received:
    7
    Yes, but the Google's translation - and Babelfish - was not working from my computer this morning in this Chinese page :oops: . For this motive I had put this it here;), here some people are polyglots ;)
     
  8. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242
    thank you. that makes sense.

    Nvidia's next new architecture won't arrive until 2009 at the soonest. maybe not until 2010.

    NV60 / G100 / GeForce 10 doesn't have to be a Direct3D11
    part, but it could be. it probably will be.
     
  9. Ailuros

    Ailuros Epsilon plus three
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,511
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Chania
    They still have to deliver D3D10.1 GPUs in the meantime.

    I've no idea what they name internally things anymore, nor does it really matter what the final products will be named. We'll probably see a series of high end D3D10.1 GPUs until the D3D11 thingy finally arrives and the first may as well be name GF10 in the meantime. In the past I had heard about a supposed "G200" intermitting "G90" and "G100".

    If those codenames really existed and it wasn't just a fool's errand, then I'd guess what was supposed to be "G200" could still arrive in next year but definitely not as early as Fudo wants everyone to believe. If s.o. from NV is in a humorous mood tomorrow and tells him that "G100" comes in May with 640SPs he'll plaster it on his page w/o even double checking if it's even possible heh...*shrug*
     
  10. Unknown Soldier

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Memory at 3200Mhz .. wow .. ok it is GDDR5 .. but that's huge bandwidth. How much bandwidth can we be expect if it is 780Mhz core and (2GB)3200Mhz mem. with a 512Bit bus? I know we missing ROP's etc. but what is the minimum/maximum bandwidth(ballpark figure is fine)?

    US
     
  11. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4
  12. aca

    aca
    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Delft, The Netherlands
    I thought R700 is something for 2009. From AMD slides it seems that 2008 products are R6xx based. I think now is the appropriate moment to use the roll eyes smiley, no? :wink:
     
  13. TheAlSpark

    TheAlSpark Moderator
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2004
    Messages:
    22,146
    Likes Received:
    8,533
    Location:
    ಠ_ಠ


    Bandwidth = memory bus width/8bits per byte * effective memory clock speed

    That gives 204.8 GiB/s.

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Geo

    Geo Mostly Harmless
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,116
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    Uffda-land
    There seems to be at least a whispering campaign going on from the AMD camp that this isn't so and R700 will show up in 2008.
     
  15. AnarchX

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    34
    The question is, which "R700" is meant.:wink:

    I think it is 3.2GHz real clock, since GDDR5 starts at 2-2.5GHz.
     
  16. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4
    Any idea time frame apart - different between R680 and R700?

    Edit: Maybe 4 months??
     
    #256 Shtal, Jan 3, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 3, 2008
  17. leoneazzurro

    Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    518
    Likes Received:
    25
    Location:
    Rome, Italy
    There is a rumor that 9800 GTX could be G92 based, so if this is the case, nothing more to expect than an heavy overclocked 8800 GTS

    http://www.hwupgrade.it/news/skvideo/geforce-9800-gx2-i-primi-dettagli_23750.html

    it's in Italian , I will report the phrase in the news:

    "A seguire NVIDIA presenterà dei die shrink delle proprie soluzioni GeForce 8800 GTX: parliamo della scheda che dovrebbe prendere il nome di GeForce 9800 GTX, costruita utilizzando chip G92 con tecnologia produttiva a 65 nanometri mantenendo presumibilmente le stesse specifiche delle schede GeForce 8800 GTX in termini di stream processors as the 8800 GTX.

    Una scheda GeForce 9800 GT dovrebbe venir presentata da NVIDIA tra i mesi di Marzo e Aprile: mancano informazioni sull'architettura utilizzata da questa GPU ma presupponiamo possa trattarsi sempre della GPU G92, con frequenze di clock incrementate e presumibilmente sempre con bus memoria da 256bit di ampiezza."

    Translated, is (in Italic my comments):

    "Following (the 9800X2) Nvidia will announce the die shrink of their GeForce 8800 GTX solutions: we are talking about the board that should take the name Geforce 9800 GTX, built using G92 chips with 65 nm process technology, presumably keeping the same specification for the number of stream processors.

    A 9800 GT board should be also announced by Nvidia between March and April: informations about the architecture used by this GPU but we suppose it could be G92 based, too, with higher clock (than the 8800 GT) and the same 256 bit bus"


    Obviously this is not G100, but (again , if this is true) it could mean that G100 will not arrive before 5-6 months at least.
     
    #257 leoneazzurro, Jan 4, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 4, 2008
  18. Unknown Soldier

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    Kewl thx AlStrong :)

    US
     
  19. Pressure

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    593
    We all know how well heaps of bandwidth helped the R600 chip...
     
  20. Unknown Soldier

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,047
    Likes Received:
    1,670
    I think it's more because they used it un-effeciently. The R600 just couldn't do AA properely .. it wasn't because of the heaps of bandwidth available.

    US
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...