mckmas8808
Legend
nAo talks about Heavenly Sword (You need to read this)
- Thread starter mckmas8808
- Start date
mckmas8808
Legend
My bad. I seen that thread name too. I was wondering why nobody on was talking about it. 
nintenho said:
Generally speaking, if the lighting is good, it will look good whether in SD or HD. HD might give you a bit better colour accuracy, but if the lighting in impressive, it will be impressive either way. That's one of the reasons why proper CGI movies and videos look so good even on DVD, because the lighting is just very good. HD will give you a sharper, more detailed image.
... i just told you...nintenho said:
Ingenu said:Someone please get Marco to release a 60FPS games, 30FPS is SOOOOOOOOO last gen !
(Crap, am I the only one to want really smooth motion ?!)
Nope... but I'm kinda paranoid of getting more negative rep for being such a framerate whore... but I see it the same too. I'd rather have that extra framerate than the extra eye-candy....
*runs and hides*
PS: Nice interview Xbd & nAo. Excellent read. Thanks!
As I say, they should include the option in all games and appease everyone. Probably not very practical, but keeping all the people happy all the time generally isn't
Nintenho : HDR is just a way of producing the scene. The picture that comes out the back of the box is still 8 bits per pixel colour whether on HD or SD. HDMI 1.3 adds the option for HDR output, which might one-day find it's way to driving an HDR TV that can actually do something with greater than 24 bit colour representation (though really HDR sginals want to go the way of CIE Luv - colour and intensity - at which point a standardised NAO32 colour model over a lower-spec'd cable would probably work well enough) but that'll require costly HDR TVs, and games to output HDR signals. Maybe, like GT4's 1080i output, one game on PS3 will do that as a gimmick in the next 10 years?
Nintenho : HDR is just a way of producing the scene. The picture that comes out the back of the box is still 8 bits per pixel colour whether on HD or SD. HDMI 1.3 adds the option for HDR output, which might one-day find it's way to driving an HDR TV that can actually do something with greater than 24 bit colour representation (though really HDR sginals want to go the way of CIE Luv - colour and intensity - at which point a standardised NAO32 colour model over a lower-spec'd cable would probably work well enough) but that'll require costly HDR TVs, and games to output HDR signals. Maybe, like GT4's 1080i output, one game on PS3 will do that as a gimmick in the next 10 years?
While it would be nice to lower the graphical settings to get 60fps (ala PC), this is assuming the GPU is the only bottleneck. If the game engine (or subsets of it) are targetting 30fps then changing the graphic detail may not be a major gain. e.g. I remember DeanoC saying the flags at one point were very computationally expensive. If NT tossed in enough flags so the engine ran at 30fps and geared the graphics front end for the same, just lowering graphical detail wont increase frequency.
Maybe they should make 2 consoles:
PS3-30
PS3-60
The PS3-60 has 2x the power across the board and makes 30fps game run at 60fps I wont disclose the price for a 6.4GHz CELL with a 1100MHz RSX and 6.4GHz XDR and 1.4GHz GDDR3 video memory...
Rest assure you TOO can feel like a PC enthusiest by plopping down over $5K for a state of the art gaming platform!
Maybe they should make 2 consoles:
PS3-30
PS3-60
The PS3-60 has 2x the power across the board and makes 30fps game run at 60fps
I wont disclose the price for a 6.4GHz CELL with a 1100MHz RSX and 6.4GHz XDR and 1.4GHz GDDR3 video memory...Rest assure you TOO can feel like a PC enthusiest by plopping down over $5K for a state of the art gaming platform!
They could get around it by halving everything. At 60fps mode, you get half the enemies, half the buildings, half the number of textures, half the physics objects to calculate...
Or they just do two builds with optimized resources for each and let the gamer slect. BRD's got at least 20 GBs to fill up, so may as well put on two copies of the same game!
Or they just do two builds with optimized resources for each and let the gamer slect. BRD's got at least 20 GBs to fill up, so may as well put on two copies of the same game!
mckmas8808
Legend
Shifty Geezer said:They could get around it by halving everything. At 60fps mode, you get half the enemies, half the buildings, half the number of textures, half the physics objects to calculate...
Or they just do two builds with optimized resources for each and let the gamer slect. BRD's got at least 20 GBs to fill up, so may as well put on two copies of the same game!
You guys are crazy.
Would a steady 30 fps really hurt?Another thing to keep in mind is that from all the impressions I've seen I can't think of one that has said anything bad about the games animation, I'm pretty sure people have said it's some of the best they have seen. I dont recall where I've read this but i'm positive it's been stated, dont feel like browsing previews again.
Am I correct in thinking that FPS normally has an impact on a games animation system? The way i see it, 30 or 60, who cares?? The game has some of the best animation we've seen to date. Just make sure it's a solid FPS and things are fine.
Am I correct in thinking that FPS normally has an impact on a games animation system? The way i see it, 30 or 60, who cares?? The game has some of the best animation we've seen to date. Just make sure it's a solid FPS and things are fine.
scooby_dooby
Legend
serenity said:
720p upscaled. No-one has 1080p sets anyways, and 720p is sexy, don't worry.
