Posting it here, because I'm sure it will come to 360 and Kinect ...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13343600
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13343600
IMO they paid way too much.
The suggestions are that MS, Facebook and Google were interested parties. Part of the price, I think, is likely to ensure that Google doesn't take control of it. It has been suggested that Facebook may still be able to access what they would want from it as MS is a heavy shareholder in Facebook - they certainly have take FB integration into WP7 to a heavy degree so having Skype of FB is something they may want as that is likely to be fully integrated into WP7 (or WPx.x) in future.Facebook chat perhaps? Maybe the 8 billion was the result of a bidding war between Facebook and Microsoft? (Making some wild guesses here)
The suggestions are that MS, Facebook and Google were interested parties. Part of the price, I think, is likely to ensure that Google doesn't take control of it. It has been suggested that Facebook may still be able to access what they would want from it as MS is a heavy shareholder in Facebook - they certainly have take FB integration into WP7 to a heavy degree so having Skype of FB is something they may want as that is likely to be fully integrated into WP7 (or WPx.x) in future.
Yeah, 18 months ago it was worth 2.7 billion ... so that seems steep to be sure. But I'm guessing the handheld, tablet and TV integration markets are considered to be big game-changers here, and I don't think that is fully without merit. If Skype video chat becomes a default thing on modern TVs, that could change the way we communicate pretty considerably.
They are paying about $50 per person whereas Skype generates about $97 per person. I thought it was too much as well originally until bloomberg dropped that tidbit. Now what I need/want is for MSFT and GOOG to take on Big Cell and get some ubiquitous wifi going.
The suggestions are that MS, Facebook and Google were interested parties. Part of the price, I think, is likely to ensure that Google doesn't take control of it.
its interesting because apparently windows messenger has double the users for video chat.
But anyway this could be good , hopefully they add skype into xbox 360 and i can video chat on my tv with kinect. I also know it will be alot easier to get my parents to learn how to skype on kinect than through the pc and my mother will like seeing my niece and nephew on a 60 inch tv screen rather than her 14 inch laptop screen
Yeah, after my initial short-sighted post, I discussed this with a few coworkers and some advantage came to mind. Skype has good brand awareness, IMO much better than Windows Messenger, and MS can capitalize on this in the future.
Interesting, do you have a link? I looked but no luck
I was only going by the reports that they lost $7 million last year and were estimated to be worth much less than what MS purchased them for.
I was thinking the same thing as well, but it was reported that Google and Facebook were offering $3-$4 billion, so I wonder why they decided to pay more than twice the amount just to outbid them.
I see some over zealous moderator deleted my last post (how is this not censorship)
where I said buying skype was a pretty good idea
though I just read the last owners of skype brought it in 2009 for $1.9 billion
18months later MS buys it for $8.5billion, wow MS must have a good price negotiator (*), not
(*)prolly John key (NZ PM)
They are paying about $50 per person whereas Skype generates about $97 per person. I thought it was too much as well originally until bloomberg dropped that tidbit. Now what I need/want is for MSFT and GOOG to take on Big Cell and get some ubiquitous wifi going.
No, it generates $97 per paying customer. If you only count those Microsoft is paying $1000 per person.
Skype makes most of its money through SkypeOut/SkupeIn. Microsoft can probably attract more businesses to these services. Outlook integration would be nice.
Xbox has had video chat long before Kinect. Skype will allow video chat with non Xbox devices.