Janet+Justin!
- Thread starter Deepak
- Start date
EXACTLY!!!!!!!!
We are fed gangsta-culture, gun-culture, violence in games and on TV and such everyday at any time of the day, and people make a big fuss about Janet's nipple...
We are fed gangsta-culture, gun-culture, violence in games and on TV and such everyday at any time of the day, and people make a big fuss about Janet's nipple...
THe difference being that some parents don't let their kids watch that shit, and don't expect to see it in a football game, either.
from cnn.com a statement from janet jacksonlondon-boy said:epicstruggle said:Both janet and justin have publicly stated that it was no accident. Please get your facts straight. Your sounding like the bbc.london-boy said:
later,
epic
HUH? Well, i might sound like the BBC but i have heard NOWHERE that they publicly stated it was no accident. Actually the opposite. But that's not really the point here is it...
. Had you researched this, you would have found that janet had appoligized and admitted that she planned this after rehearsels. So now you are correctly informed that this was NO accident but a publicity stunt, since she has a record coming out shortly.
later,
epic
RussSchultz said:
It's a NIPPLE. Shown for a few seconds if even that... I mean it wasn't a show of Justin Timberlake assfucking Janet Jackson for god's sake.... Excuse the finesse...
So who should decide what is acceptable for children? You? The govermnent? How about parents, nah..., they know nothing.london-boy said:
later,
epic
The NIPPLE was the accident. Of course the dress was supposed to come off, Mr Research...
Hello, look what i posted earlier in the thread:
Happy?
Hello, look what i posted earlier in the thread:
London-boy said:
Happy?
Very eloquent use of words, sir!
I'd actually say that most parents know nothing. I mean the irony of 'protecting' kids from the opposite sex and then whining about gay marriages is kind of interesting, since I know that alot of you argued that you aren't born gay but rather that you chose it. Anyway, I've now probably doomed this thread to destruction by mentioning gay marriage - it was fun while it lasted.
I guess where they are from, parents shouldnt expect to be able to raise their kids as they see fit.RussSchultz said:
later,
epic
God, your not reading are you. She admitted that the nipple was what she wanted shown. Maybe justin wasnt aware of that. BUT SHE DID WANT IT(NIPPLE) OUT THERE. GOT IT.london-boy said:
read her statement, or see the video confession/admission.later,
epic
epicstruggle said:God, your not reading are you. She admitted that the nipple was what she wanted shown. Maybe justin wasnt aware of that. BUT SHE DID WANT IT(NIPPLE) OUT THERE. GOT IT.london-boy said:
later,
epic
Well, it might have been translated from American to English but what we got here was the "no nipple" version... oh well who cares...
oi said:
Thank you!
And you're obviously missing the point that no one wants to take away the right for parents to raise their kids, but that we're rather just saying how odd their values regarding matters such as sex and violence are. I just find it funny that some think sex = bad, violence = family entertainment.
Anyway I definitely think it is in bad taste, and although I don't have any kids I do know enough parents who were pissed about it.
If a parent think violence is ok and nudity is not then it is their perogative to decide what their kid sees.
I think it is funny that the NFL said MTV cannot produce anymore halftime shows... maybe they will use VH1 of course MTV, VH1, and CBS are all owned by viacom so I suppose they don't care either way.
If a parent think violence is ok and nudity is not then it is their perogative to decide what their kid sees.
I think it is funny that the NFL said MTV cannot produce anymore halftime shows... maybe they will use VH1 of course MTV, VH1, and CBS are all owned by viacom so I suppose they don't care either way.
My problem with the whole fiasco was the fact that it was blatantly obvious that they were pulling a choreographed stunt, but they tried to say it was a mistake or whatever. That's simply BS and insults the intelligence of those who saw what happened. I think the parents who were watching with their kids should not have been exposed to that, especially given the fact that there are laws on the books regarding what times "nudity" can be on broadcast television, i.e. after 10pm. This was the superbowl, and given the venue and the time, it was highly innappropriate.
However, I find it quite hysterical that many of the conservative pundits you see coming out of the woodwork to bash Janet have absolutely nothing to say about Weapons of Mass Destruction or the Economy. You know, things that actually matter to our collective wellbeing?
50 year old augmented titties do nothing for me personally, and frankly I couldn't care less about it. But I can see why other people do. But to take airtime away from things that actually affect our day to day lives? Please. This has gone way too far.
However, I find it quite hysterical that many of the conservative pundits you see coming out of the woodwork to bash Janet have absolutely nothing to say about Weapons of Mass Destruction or the Economy. You know, things that actually matter to our collective wellbeing?
50 year old augmented titties do nothing for me personally, and frankly I couldn't care less about it. But I can see why other people do. But to take airtime away from things that actually affect our day to day lives? Please. This has gone way too far.
If you actually watch the video and notice Jackson's reaction after her breast was bared, (It actually wasn't the nipple, there was some sort of metal nipple protector or something on it), there's no way in hell she expected that to happen. She looked like she was just as shocked as anyone in the crowd, and probably slightly more embarrassed.
Hell mustve frozen over, I actually agree with natoma.Natoma said:
ACTUALLY, Pat buchanan, has been quite critical of bush in regards to the economy, war with iraq, and work visa program. Others have too.
Yes, but then again, we see news coverage always pandering to the masses. Look at current hot news items:
-missing girl abducted from the car wash.
-laci peterson
-michael jackson
-martha stewart
lots of things take away time from serious debating/news items. If everything was serious in the news, no one would watch it. just my 2 cents.
later,
epic
Personally, I find it worrying that there has been all this controversy about seeing a nipple. I know the idea that nipples are a 'sexual' part of the body comes from cultural factors, but let's face it, we've all got nipples so why should anyone be upset about seeing them anywhere?
I can understand why there might be some hassle about exposing genetalia as this is still considered somewhat 'rude', but nipples? C'mon, that's just ridiculous.
I can understand why there might be some hassle about exposing genetalia as this is still considered somewhat 'rude', but nipples? C'mon, that's just ridiculous.
Hehe, I once saw a soccer game between Celtic and some other team which had this awesome streaker. After the half time break he had disguised himself as the ref and then went straight to the middle of the field and blew his whistle for kick-off and then just tore his clothes off and entered his moment of fame
oi said:
Hehe, I once saw a soccer game between Celtic and some other team which had this awesome streaker. After the half time break he had disguised himself as the ref and then went straight to the middle of the field and blew his whistle for kick-off and then just tore his clothes off and entered his moment of fame
That's a very cool idea. It brings a whole new dimension to flashing
