On 2008, June 3rd, our employee Tomonobu Itagaki ("the Employee") announced to news organizations that he'd resign on July 1st, and he had sued Tecmo for the payment of completion bonus and the reparation money for behavior of Tecmo and the CEO of Tecmo toward the Employee, and the reason of the lawsuit.
After the end of the case at the court of appeal about sexual harassment in which the Employee was one of the litigants, we explained the course of it to our employees while urging the Employee to concentrate on his duties by complying with the rule of our company, during when the Employee has one-sidedly brought this legal action against us.
In our company, there is a completion bonus system based on prescribed procedure, besides seasonal bonuses. Every year we have been paying the Employee the completion bonus for projects including DOA4. The bonus the Employee claims is different from the aforesaid bonus and there is no decision that approved it. It was also in the tenure of the previous CEO and therefore a one-sided complaint.
Also, the claim for the reparation money for behavior of Tecmo and the CEO of Tecmo toward the Employee is due to contortion by the Employee and based on things we never had conversation on and we never stated.
Though we've been considering the legal action brought by the Employee to be an important issue, we've abstained from making a public statement as the legal action is due to a personal cause. However, in addition to making the legal action public, the Employee issued a public statement to news organizations which claims the Employee almost single-handedly developed game titles into which the staff members of Team NINJA, one of our development studios, have put their blood through many years.
While the action by the Employee is very regrettable, what the statement meant will become clearer as time passes, whether or not.
The announcement due to a personal cause which is one-sided and different from the fact hurts the social trust and status of our company, also it damages our customers, stockholders, employees, trading partners, and others concerned.
On the other hand, currently, Team NINJA, one of our development studios, is already running the development line of a new title. All of our company including Team NINJA will concentrate on delivering attractive titles.
We sincerely apologize that we disturbed our customers, stockholders, and trading partners and appreciate your continuing support.
But...it was a remake. All remakes are copies of the original. And for a next-generation NG2 certainly hasn't pushed the next-gen visuals. I don't know about gameplay.I didnt like that attitude:
http://www.joystiq.com/2008/05/21/itagaki-ninja-gaiden-sigma-is-no-good/
"Despite the fact that it's on a 'next-generation' console there's no evolution whatsoever. That was made not by me, but one of my sub-ordinates who basically tried to copy the success of Ninja Gaiden."
Tecmo issued a comment, and here's my translation.
http://www.tecmo.co.jp/company/pdf/20080604.pdf
http://www.famitsu.com/game/news/1215592_1124.html
But...it was a remake. All remakes are copies of the original. And for a next-generation NG2 certainly hasn't pushed the next-gen visuals. I don't know about gameplay.
I wonder if you pit Itagaki and Eggbricht in a critique of each other's work and abilities, who'd come out on top
I didnt like that attitude:
I totally understand it and would have no problem repeating it (if I was Itagaki) even if I was sitting with the whole Sigma team with the president and CEO of Tecmo sitting right beside me.
I think the timing and release of Ninja Gaiden Sigma is very problematic and the underlying issue of this whole fiasco and I think Itagaki being uninvolved in the PS3 port is a testament to that issue.
A remake should never appear on a next gen console when the release of its sequel is right around the corner. I can't figure out how Tecmo thought that this would be a good ideal and would have no impact on Ninja Gaiden II.
Ninja Gaiden II was guaranteed not to be critically received as well with Sigma being just a year old versus Sigma never being released. Ninja Gaiden II would have had to been a major major upgrade to overcome the release of Sigma. Sigma being released only on the PS3 isn't going to change the fact that anyone who reviewed Ninja Gaiden 2 would have used Sigma as the baseline of judgement not Ninja Gaiden on the xbox from 2004 as reviewers aren't typically limited to one console.
Halo 3, GTA4, MGS4, KZ2, GT5 and any other big name sequel would have faced similar issues if remakes with upgraded graphics and new additional features to each franchise would have appeared on the 360 or PS3 before the sequel. And Im sure every dev of those before mentioned franchise would have blown a gasket if not publicly but definitely privately if their publishers would have ok'd next gen remake ports.
From a critical reception and business standpoint releasing Sigma before Ninja Gaiden II made no practical sense, even if the goal was to maximize profits.
Ninja Gaiden II was guaranteed not to be critically received as well with Sigma being just a year old versus Sigma never being released. Ninja Gaiden II would have had to been a major major upgrade to overcome the release of Sigma. Sigma being released only on the PS3 isn't going to change the fact that anyone who reviewed Ninja Gaiden 2 would have used Sigma as the baseline of judgement not Ninja Gaiden on the xbox from 2004 as reviewers aren't typically limited to one console.
If it wasn't a major upgrade (and I'm not saying it wasn't), isn't that his own fault, though? Itadaki must've know everything that would be in Sigma, and would be very well-positioned to raise the bar on his own game, if it was necessary.
Neither of us really knows what his motivation was to dislike Sigma, but if it was that, it seems lazy. Are we really making excuses for sequelitis on behalf of developers?
snip
fMs would be smart to snap him up. Give him a small studio and see about getting him an action franchise to rival GoW. Wouldn't need to be a huge studio either.
Sony could use him also , GoW could use a sister title . There can't be a gow every year after all .
That wouldn't happen, From what I know, he has some sort of hatred going on between him and Sony, couldn't remember exactly what though.
I bet that if he works with them hell will brake lose in their offices. He seems more like a guy who wants things go his way than a guy that collaborates and likes taking orders