Right now, I would assume that BD in PS3 is 2 layer only, and will stay that way probably always.
I would too. Otherwise, why would Kojima be complaining about dual layer capacity?
I would too. Otherwise, why would Kojima be complaining about dual layer capacity?
That's a different discussion held several times on this board. I suggest you use the search function. Opinion is strongly divided such that there's no consensus!This problem make big discusions on czech forums with Xbots. It is DVD9 too old and small for big games in years 2009++ ?
That's a different discussion held several times on this board. I suggest you use the search function. Opinion is strongly divided such that there's no consensus!
Would that limit its movie-playing ability, or are BD movies expected to stay at 2 layers?Right now, I would assume that BD in PS3 is 2 layer only, and will stay that way probably always.
Would that limit its movie-playing ability, or are BD movies expected to stay at 2 layers?
This week at the CEATEC JAPAN 2007 event, Hitachi announced that they had successfully created a quad layer Blu-ray disc that can store up to 100 GB of data.
To sweeten the pot even more, Hitachi says the discs are compatible with existing Blu-ray players and drives after an easy firmware update.
Hitachi says they are now working on "improving the signal quality of its quad-layer technology" so that it can be ready to hit the market soon.
My bad english ... i mean want not
Being formerly employed by a hardware vendor, I always laugh out loud when somebody claims it will only take firmware upgrade to support feature xyz.
If I had a $, well maybe £ or € at the current rates, for each time we ran across some undocumented/unexpected flaw or a result of someone wanted to shave another cent of a component, and that forced us to do a hardware replacement.
Well I probably would not be rich, but I would have had some more atleast
Would that limit its movie-playing ability, or are BD movies expected to stay at 2 layers?