Megadrive1988 said:2.) Intel's path on graphics seems to be somewhat like that of SEGA; Real3D, then PowerVR
mat said:just found this one: Intel's future graphics tech is Power VR
Edit: but it talsk about G965, not discrete GPUs
Chalnoth said:Intel's "secret" GPU? Give me a break. Intel's the leading manufacturer of GPU's! Now that Vista's coming around and will require some amount of power, it should be no secret that Intel would like to retain that marketshare in its integrated designs.
Perhaps. But there may yet be noticeable differences in how snappy the interface is between the absolute lowest-end 3D hardware that can support Aeroglass and higher-end hardware.Fox5 said:Their GMA950 already supports Aeroglass. BTW, why doesn't their GMA900 support Aeroglass? It's virtually the same thing as the 950, but at a lower clock speed. Niether one has hardware vertex shaders, though the GMA950's typical pairing with a Core Duo probably helps out there.
Chalnoth said:Perhaps. But there may yet be noticeable differences in how snappy the interface is between the absolute lowest-end 3D hardware that can support Aeroglass and higher-end hardware.
Apparently GMA900, even though it supports all the needed features, is just too slowFox5 said:Their GMA950 already supports Aeroglass. BTW, why doesn't their GMA900 support Aeroglass? It's virtually the same thing as the 950, but at a lower clock speed. Niether one has hardware vertex shaders, though the GMA950's typical pairing with a Core Duo probably helps out there.
Kaotik said:Apparently GMA900, even though it supports all the needed features, is just too slow
geo said:Except the stirring was apparent before the merger was a done deal, so I rather doubt cause and effect there.
Ailuros said:Real3D--->PowerVR--->NVIDIA
X-bit labs: There are a lot of rumours that Intel is coming back to the market of discrete GPUs. Could such rumours be a reason of AMD-ATI merge?
Tom McCoy: We have heard that rumour too, but we do not know whether they are true or not true. But Intel has a long history of always trying to capture all the silicon on the motherboards that are housing Intel CPUs. Hence, that would be consistent with their strategy to use other independent companies to support their economy when they need it and cut them off when they do not.
AFAIK, they read beyond3d's forums toogeo said:AMD/ATI's take:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/editorial/display/amd_atyt_interview_7.html
Interesting that they went right to "independent companies" there, isn't it? Rather than assuming Intel had their own in-house design. Who could they have in mind (yes, that's a rhetorical question)?
geo said:Tell me that doesn't sound like a master's thesis.
geo has a bright future
geo said:Tell me that doesn't sound like a master's thesis.