Inside ATI Silicon Valley @ DH

T2k

Veteran
ati006.jpg


(...)
I also got a little peak at one of the m10 Mobility Radeon 9600 chips, which was in a desktop AGP package that let them test the chip in a normal desktop computer as if it were a normal r3xx chip. As you can see in the picture (above), it only needs a small passive heatsink to stay cool, which is important for mobility chips for reasons of power consumption and weight (who would want a big heavy heatsink with a battery-draining fan on it in their laptop?).


Read over here: http://www.driverheaven.net/insideati2/

Edit: fixed link
 
From the article...
This process ensures that no release of the CATALYST drivers will be slower than it?s previous version, as all changes in the drivers that could reduce performance can be caught by this lab and then removed from the drivers.
... but what if that change is a (dare I say it) bug fix? Does the poor engineer also then have to locate and optimise something else?
 
Simon F said:
... but what if that change is a (dare I say it) bug fix? Does the poor engineer also then have to locate and optimise something else?
They chain you to your desk until you get that 0.4fps back on Quake 2.
 
Dio said:
Simon F said:
... but what if that change is a (dare I say it) bug fix? Does the poor engineer also then have to locate and optimise something else?
They chain you to your desk until you get that 0.4fps back on Quake 2.
Hmm might be easier to write a patch for Q2 itself.

Anyway, anyone want to speculate on the chip image on page 3 .
Flipper?
 
Ahh, that confirms it (and, no doubt, why he was allowed to take the picture in the first place :) ). It certainly has a stonking amount of RAM.
 
K.I.L.E.R said:
Flash RAM? ;)
Talk about SloooooooooooooooW! :LOL:
Err... Pardon me for asking (but I never can tell); are you just making a pun on "clever" = "flash" or are you confusing 1T-SRAM with Flash? If it's the former then I humbly apologise.
 
OpenGL guy said:
Simon F said:
Ahh, that confirms it (and, no doubt, why he was allowed to take the picture in the first place :) ). It certainly has a stonking amount of RAM.
1T RAM = good stuff :)
Its certainly good for ASIC design, though I kinda question why they built an external chip out of it and used it.

DDR-SDRAM would be cheaper, denser, and faster.
 
RussSchultz said:
Its certainly good for ASIC design, though I kinda question why they built an external chip out of it and used it.

DDR-SDRAM would be cheaper, denser, and faster.
One possibility is the elimination of page breaks.
 
Back
Top