Sure, but no one ever argued that. In fact, the incorrect "cut and dry" argument turned out to be "more cores = less yield"?
So what if none argued that? Arguing in a vacuum is pretty stupid just like the cut and dry statement that defects are directly related to die size. Regardless the original statement was more cores AND larger die size so stop trying to shift the goal posts.
But we were discussing yields, not cost per chip. I certainly wouldn't be surprised if CELL turns out to be more expensive than XeCPU but that's irrelevant to the earlier discussion.
LMAO, cost is related to yields.
So what if none argued that? Arguing in a vacuum is pretty stupid just like the cut and dry statement that defects are directly related to die size. Regardless the original statement was more cores AND larger die size so stop trying to shift the goal posts.
But we were discussing yields, not cost per chip. I certainly wouldn't be surprised if CELL turns out to be more expensive than XeCPU but that's irrelevant to the earlier discussion.
LMAO, cost is related to yields.
).