_xxx_ said:
I wasn't joking. Why should a multinational company ever say they're sorry for whatever blah? It's not like it's a really important issue, noone died, noone broke his leg. Know what I mean?
Maybe it's a matter of explaining to your fans and stock holders why a competitor arose from relative obscurity into the 3d chip markets you were dominating to absolutely stomp on your head and forcibly take away a mountain of the business you had smugly counted on dominating in perpetuity? Just a thought...
But I think nV40 is apology enough, don't you? I mean, nV40 is a direct and absolute repudiation of nV's nV3x production and marketing, isn't it? I'm relieved not to have to suffer through any more "DX9 is not the future of 3d but DX8.x is the cat's meow" marketing drivel, aren't you? That's apology enough, seems to me. nV went from a self-described "leader" in 3d to an abjectly humbled "follower" in the space of a couple of years, and so I certainly think that's apology enough. Could it be any more obvious that ATi has set the pace and tone of 3d for the last two years, even snagging the xBox from nV's cold, but not-quite-dead-yet fingers (and getting a deal with none of the weaknesses of nV's former arrangement to boot)...?
Trying to resurrect worn, tired, and outdated concepts like 3dfx's SLI--in name only--is a gimmick not an advance (I'd have preferred if it
had been Scan Line Interleaving.) Basically, the two nV apologies "I'd like to see" (reminds me of MAD Magazine) involve pawning off nV30/5/8 as "8-pixel-pipeline/pixels-per-clock" gpus merely because a competitor was actually selling such gpus while nV couldn't, and nV's habit of forever looking backwards and trying to reinvent the wheel concerning APIs and things like "SLI".
IMO, nV40 is probably the most obvious and distinct apology and repudiation of its nV3x distortions and misstatements as we are likely to ever see...
Seems pretty convincing to me...