Grabbed by the Ghoulies, anyone?

BirdMadBoy

Newcomer
what do you think about rare´s new game? is in usa stores since yesterday.

Ign´s review is the only one up yet i think. They rated it with a 7.0 , which i think is low giving that ign usually rates games higher than other sites.

I know it´s not a masterpiece/goty but it looks hilarious, very well done and lots of fun.
 
but it looks hilarious, very well done and lots of fun.
That's exactly what people who have played the game have been saying. Of course it's no masterpiece though. I'm going to give it a rent and see how I prefer it.
 
IGN's reviews are very inconsistent. I think they over-rate games from time to time (RAW 2 anyone?) and underate other games like Quantum Redshift and Two Towers, for example. Hard to say where Ghoulies falls at this point.
 
It was reviewed by Kaiser Hwang... if you can look though all of his reviews on games, I don't think he's ever given a decent score to anything. I met the guy 4 months ago, and he's a bit of a flake... I certianly wouldn't trust his opinion. wait and see how other review it.

Anyway, IGN needs to have multiple people review games. trusting one reviewers opinions just doesn't cut it IMO.
 
IGN's score is actually one of the higher scores I've seen for it, I've heard nothing but negative so far.
 
Johnny Awesome said:
LOL! There's only three scores right now - 7 (IGN), 4/5 and 4/5. :rolleyes:

GamePro.com 10/22/2003 4 out of 5 80.0%
IGN 10/21/2003 7 out of 10 70.0%
1UP 10/23/2003 6.5 out of 10 65.0%
 
1up gave it a 6.5/10
Stuff gaming gave it a 6/10

Stuff gaming NEVER gives low scores, they have more 100%'s than any publication I have ever read.

IGN is the one who gave Starfox Adventures a 90/100
which lead to me buying it, what a lifeless boring piece of crap that game
was..

1UP basically put it the way I imagined it, its Luigis Mansion with all the freedom removed(just as SFA was Zelda with all its freedom removed). And twice as short.
 
LisaJoy said:
1up gave it a 6.5/10
Stuff gaming gave it a 6/10

Stuff gaming NEVER gives low scores, they have more 100%'s than any publication I have ever read.

IGN is the one who gave Starfox Adventures a 90/100
which lead to me buying it, what a lifeless boring piece of crap that game
was..

1UP basically put it the way I imagined it, its Luigis Mansion with all the freedom removed(just as SFA was Zelda with all its freedom removed). And twice as short.

the 1up reviewer beat the game in 1 day? really? :( .

I love the style and humour of GbtG but in europe will be sold for 60 euros, compared to usa 40 $ price, and i´m starting to think about the possibilitty of waitting untill it goes down to 30 euros if the game it´s really that short.
 
There are some positives about this game. For a start I like the homorous play on words in the title.... and then there's... erm.... I'll get my coat :LOL:

But seriously, it looks like an ok game, but its pretty disapointing from Rare.
 
wazoo said:
BirdMadBoy said:
the 1up reviewer beat the game in 1 day? really? :( .

walkthrough is already available the day after the review at IGN.

what kind of review does the 1up if it uses a walkthrough and rushes to end the game, i don´t think that´s a fair indication for the readers. You can beat resident evil in a day too but i don´t think anyone did it the first time they played it, how are you gonna enjoy the game then?

found another review, this one is from a gamer, well written and even scores the game ( he did liked it, very easy to pick up and play, adictive, fun and a lot of humor ):

http://forum.teamxbox.com/showthread.php?s=916b3bddfc2d94589e3f8a215ed7bf45&threadid=223498 ( edit: there are other gamers reviews there, some not that positive though )

which is the url of stuff gaming? thx
 
I can't help it if more reviews pop up after I post, now can I?

Starfox Adventures was a good game btw. :)

I'm picking up GbtG tonight. I'll post my impressions this weekend.
 
What's funny is that thtis game is targetted at younger kids like many titles of nintendo's games. Youwon't see advertisements for it on at midnight like you would with eternal darkness or metroid prime. I just saw a long TV commercial for it in combination with a promotion on YTV (Young television).
 
Johnny Awesome said:
I can't help it if more reviews pop up after I post, now can I?

Starfox Adventures was a good game btw. :)

I'm picking up GbtG tonight. I'll post my impressions this weekend.

Name one thing good about SFA other than graphics and polish?

pointless combat on both land and air(just hit the button and have no worries)
linear and boring objectives
blah, lifeless game(and I mean in personality and fun factor.. not in actual NPC life)
 
That's arguable, heh. Wario World is shorter, but probably has better gameplay.. and that's it basically.

SFA is the better game of the two, but I still think it's very flawed. I was surprised at how much better TWW was.
 
Although I realise that legions of Nintendo fans disagree with me, I found Starfox Adventures to be refreshing and fun. I loved the story, presentation, graphics, audio, seemless world, gameplay variety, characters, and the item collecting (that pretty much every platform/adventure game has, but for some reason this game got criticized for.)

The only thing that was really lacking was the combat system which could have used more complexity. But you have to understand that it was clearly aimed at young children, which leads me to Grabbed by the Ghoulies:

GbtG is great - If you are a young child between the ages of 6 and 12. Otherwise your mileage will very substantially.

I've spent about an hour with the game and find it to be up to Rare's usual standards for presentation, graphics, audio, story etc... But the gameplay is clearly aimed at being simple enough, yet amusing enough, for young children to really enjoy playing it. This is precisely what Rare was trying to accomplish and they did so brilliantly.

Personally, for me so far the game is an 8.5/10, but I sympathize with the need for Gamespot (6.5) and IGN (7) to tell their main audience (16 - 26 year old hardcore gamers) to take a pass on Ghoulies. Conversely, I also agree with Gamepro for scoring the game a 4/5, because they service a wider audience beyond hardcore internet junkies.

I'm just about 10% of the way through the game right now and I'll be back to report more later, but I'm having fun with this game so far. In the end I think I'll agree that Rare should have increased the complexity about 30% of the way through to keep adult gamers attention as well, but I certainly don't regret buying what I consider to be an extremely polished, if simple game.
 
Johnny: I agree with you on your points about SFA. It has a lot going for it.. really the main flaws lie in the facts that:

A. Like you said, the combat sucks.. and that is arguably the biggest thing for some people including myself.

B. Level design was consistent enough, but the game felt.. bland for some reason. I didn't get the same vibe from TWW.

Heh, I think I'm going to go beat SFA soon. I hear the ending is good.. and I was around 80% through it anyway..
 
I agree with the level design, but all the people complaining it was a collectathon, obviously are complaining about somehting that has plagued most platforms for years. I thought thecombat was pretty good.

I though tthe game was good, but some of the level felt way too confining. i don't think that was becuase rare sucked (as most Nfans claimed) I felt it was like that becuase the game was oringinally designed for the N64 and ported to Gamecube with updated graphics (by request of nintendo) and all the levels that were designed to be repetititive on the N64 with it's limited cartridge memory. It was just a way of making the game seem longer without neededing extra levels.

Everyone kept comparing it to zelda, but it wasn't meant to be a RPG. It borrowed the control scheme and few other feautres.
 
Back
Top