It sounds like Evilores crime was just an excuse for the admin staff to rise up. Like they had been waiting their chance.
Why? Seriously, I'm clueless about what's been going on and don't understand why the GG would be happy about this. (Also, have they turned into a pure misogynistic neo-nazi group yet? )
This looks like another Gamergate interpersonal drama the world could live without.
GG actually has nothing to do with it. This was all self-inflicted.
GG actually has nothing to do with it. This was all self-inflicted.
Well, I see on both sides egos running out of control creating a drama nobody (should) give a shit about outside the people involved. Do we really care about somebody's else sexual encounters during showers? We weren't there.
Personally I've always considered neogaf an ego driven juvenile cesspit and that its moderation now imploded doesn't surprise me.
I couldnt agree more.I feel social media has become or is becoming a wild west type place where people can make accusations and ruin people's lives without proof. I'm not saying people are lying or defending either side just that without proof or context it becomes a he said she said situation.
Everyone hates mods for their oppressing. Oppressing this, oppressing that. World's better off without them.That would depend on how you felt about the mods, I guess.
The way people were talking, I thought there was absolute evidence of foul play. I wouldn't have thought the Mod team would drop everything based on an allegation. That's a great way to ruin people's lives, if just making an allegation can get them sacked and socially outcast, as there's no defence. All the protestations of innocence in the world, just takes a few 'no smoke without fire' repetitions to brainwash the masses. This is why we have the law courts, in theory, rather than stupid copyright and patent cases worth billions, to ensure everyone is treated fairly based on what they have or haven't done, and a principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' to stop people jumping ton conclusions and treating others unfairly. I guess in reality the limitations of being human have dragged the legal system down to the common mentality. Why wait to find a proper course of action when we can grab the torches and pitchforks now and can always apologise down the line if it turns out they were innocent?Which if true makes me question the whole thing.
I feel social media has become or is becoming a wild west type place where people can make accusations and ruin people's lives without proof. I'm not saying people are lying or defending either side just that without proof or context it becomes a he said she said situation.
In a phone conversation with Kotaku, Leupp said that even after the alleged shower incident, she’d continued her friendship and even had a brief physical relationship with Malka until they had a falling out at E3 2015.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the 100% totalitarian ruling took over when GG happened? It was a time period where many figures in gaming communities took the "with us or against us" stance, and evilore made sure to kick all the mods with moderate opinions about the whole thing.GG actually has nothing to do with it. This was all self-inflicted.
What's strange is kotaku being the only one with that info, which makes it a victim-blaming-esque article.
Because there's a sexual harassment motion encouraging people to speak up, and making people (re)consider events. At the time she may have felt harassed. Then she may have gotten over it as a fairly alcohol-inspired, miserable experience which she put behind them and remained friends. Then with the #metoo motion, she's looking back at that event and emotions are shifting back towards what they were at that particular experience. Human beings can just be irrational and fly in the face of hard evidence and facts, yet people's brains can still manage to cling onto the falsehoods, because emotion can have more sway than reason. That's how it's possible the woman could make a statement that discredits her whole accusation, though there's probably zero evidence and just two contrary word-of-mouth opinions.What's strange is kotaku being the only one with that info, which makes it a victim-blaming-esque article.
Even assuming they dated after the shower episode, why would this woman make such a statement that would pretty much discredit her whole accusation?