Wouldn't the size depend on the, errrr, contents of the individual containers?Basic said:Even if every single waterborn condom for the last 30 years went into that "reef", it still wouldn't be anywhere near as large as they say.
Basic said:It says that one third of the yearly 300 million discarded condoms become waterborn, and that it may have been accumulated over decades. Even if every single waterborn condom for the last 30 years went into that "reef", it still wouldn't be anywhere near as large as they say.
Hoax.
london-boy said:...
That should make a thing that's 500m thick and 3598m long.... Errr... A third of that is still quite big...
Obviously the above is all in theoretical, if every condome is magically arranged in perfect rows and all that...
Basic said:Specially if they are matted together so densely that "you could almost land a plane on it".
Basic said:If you measure the "inflated" size 20cm and 5cm diameter, then you'd get the length and width they state if it's 180 cm deep. While the reef was "up to 60 feet deep".
But it won't have the inflated size when discarded in the water, but rather the completely colapsed size. Specially if they are matted together so densely that "you could almost land a plane on it".