Estimate a BOM delta for PS5 and XBSX

Discussion in 'Console Technology' started by Shifty Geezer, Mar 18, 2020.

Tags:
  1. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,785
    Likes Received:
    12,697
    Location:
    London, UK
    While I kind of like the mental image of Mark Cerny walking into an AMD engineering meeting and demanding AMD "take that crap out of my chip", it's generally more problematic removing logic blocks from existing designs rather than just ignoring the unwanted logic. You generally only do this if this if the issue if materially impactful on the overall transistor budget but if so, then you're already looking at a very large (and expensive) layout redesign. You don't do this lightly.
     
    xpea, Silent_Buddha and Shifty Geezer like this.
  2. AbsoluteBeginner

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2019
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    1,301
    I stay behind my opinion that difference in BOM between the two will be ~15-20$.

    Alot of SOC costs come from additional costs and not solely yielded mm² (~40%) so we could see 50mm² smaller chip but much higher clocked being very expensive once all is said and done, and not to far from bigger one.

    As for everything else, probably too close to care (memory, SSD, packaging, cooling, PCB etc).
     
    AzBat and VitaminB6 like this.
  3. Globalisateur

    Globalisateur Globby
    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2013
    Messages:
    4,592
    Likes Received:
    3,412
    Location:
    France
    I could see Sony (arrogant Sony) selling the PS5 at higher price even if their box is less powerful.
     
    PSman1700 likes this.
  4. Shifty Geezer

    Shifty Geezer uber-Troll!
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    44,106
    Likes Received:
    16,898
    Location:
    Under my bridge
    If people still buy it, it'd be the smart business move.
     
    damienw and PSman1700 like this.
  5. Rangers

    Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    12,791
    Likes Received:
    1,596

    This could be a good guess.

    I just suspect the BOM difference wont be much or any in Sony's favor. The same as their probably wasn't much on One vs PS4 despite the former being markedly weaker.

    The things I can really think of being a delta are:

    -Soc, Sony's being cheaper.
    -Cooling, Sony's presumably more expensive given the clock and Bloomberg article. HOWEVER that said, the Austin Evans video showed a hugeass heatsink for the Series X, and MS may overengineer it similar to how they did One X, so, who knows. We still nominally can charge Sony here maybe, Cerny mentioned super special cooling as well right?
    -SSD, I guess Sony's more expensive? I'm not really sure, it's faster, but is that the silicon or the IO hardware?

    I mean off the top that's two of three for Sony, not great.

    Sony can engineer a "rougher", louder, less refined system and save there though, I think they pretty much did that with PS4Pro and it was probably the right move. This alone could probably make a big difference. We haven't seen PS5, but Series X looks large and refined/costly/quiet, similar to a One X perhaps.

    The PRICE may be a different matter, with a slightly weaker GPU Sony may feel pressure to price lower, again, the bloomberg article.
     
    VitaminB6 likes this.
  6. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,785
    Likes Received:
    12,697
    Location:
    London, UK
    Sony's SSD is potentially quite a bit cheaper. They can buy failed modules intended for 1TB units which will work for their 825Gb capacity and a custom controller, albeit with the overhead for design (a one-off cost), will be cheaper than licensing a controller which is a perpetual licensing cost.

    There are a lot of variables on just this narrow issue.
     
  7. MrFox

    MrFox Deludedly Fantastic
    Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Messages:
    6,488
    Likes Received:
    5,996
    Considering their controller is more powerful because it's 12 channels and 6 priority queues, this would make it more expensive in silicon area and custom might cost more than commodity... . And there's a lot of area of a nand chip which is for the interface, so having more chips cost more for the same total capacity. Maybe it breaks even from being smaller than 1TB? Or less?

    It's 12x 512Gb chips, which adds up to 825 exactly. No idea about wear leveling margins.
     
    PSman1700 and BRiT like this.
  8. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,785
    Likes Received:
    12,697
    Location:
    London, UK
    What have I missed? Sony are not making NAND. How does this make any difference? The fabricated NAND has no concept of controller I/O channels. Sony will be buying NAND not complete NVMe solutions.

    Sony's controller is - theoretically - more powerful because Sony have designed it that way at the expense of unneeded capability. If I design a quad-bus bus I/O architecture, that doesn't make the RAM more expensive only the bus/controller.
     
    #28 DSoup, Mar 19, 2020
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2020
  9. Esrever

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2013
    Messages:
    846
    Likes Received:
    647
    Smaller NAND chips costs more in $/GB if you want to make your controller really wide. There is decent bit of fixed cost optimized out for the NAND manufacturer in this case. It might be interesting if it will cost Sony more. A lot of low end SSDs come with 1 1Tb NAND chip and next gen NAND are going for 2Tb chips. If Sony wants custom made 512Mb chips in the long run, they will likely have to pay extra for it.
     
    DSoup likes this.
  10. DSoup

    DSoup Series Soup
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,785
    Likes Received:
    12,697
    Location:
    London, UK
    I am no longer in the industry [of buying any type of storage in bulk] but when I was we focused on capacity being on x times y, i.e. the NAND element part vs. the capacity we needed for any device. The industry is generally focused on producing storage for specific capacity points and there is a lot of product that falls slightly short, so if you're targeting 0.25 / 0.5 / 1Tb of NAND, drops below but may be suitable singular/multiply for 825G rather than 1Tb.
     
  11. MrFox

    MrFox Deludedly Fantastic
    Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Messages:
    6,488
    Likes Received:
    5,996
    It depends on the brand of chip. A Micron "512gbit" is actually using a block size of 2048k+112k for wear leveling area, bad block remapping.

    (old datasheet, but to illustrate)
    • Organization
    – Page size x8: 8640 bytes (8192 + 448 bytes)
    – Block size: 256 pages (2048K + 112K bytes)
    – Plane size: 2 planes x 2048 blocks per plane

    It needs 12 chips to fill up the 12 channels, so it's obviously using 512gb chips ending up at exactly 825. There are no other possible configuration from any nand vendor.

    512x1024x1024x1024 x12 /8 = 825G
     
    #31 MrFox, Mar 19, 2020
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2020
    DSoup, VitaminB6, BRiT and 1 other person like this.
  12. TeamGhobad

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2019
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    53
    Same bom, ps5s cooling solution is going to be very expensive.
     
    PSman1700 likes this.
  13. Lurkmass

    Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2020
    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    711
    Heat output on the PS5 is arguably less of a concern compared to the XSX than most people realize. At the end of the day there's no avoiding the fact that the higher-end system comes with a ~45% wider GPU and ~25% higher bandwidth which will linearly scale as much into power consumption so just the GPU alone will prove to be a challenge in terms of thermal management without accounting for architectural/process improvements or how aggressively binned these parts will be. That's not everything since even the CPU in the XSX is clocked higher as well and it has comparatively less liberty with downclocking too so that just means less options for the system to do thermal management which means that Microsoft would have to employ a more aggressive cooling solution than their competitor in the end.
     
    disco_ likes this.
  14. BRiT

    BRiT (>• •)>⌐■-■ (⌐■-■)
    Moderator Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    20,516
    Likes Received:
    24,424
    Have you not looked at the actual system breakdown and cooling system employed by SeriesX?
     
    PSman1700 likes this.
  15. Silent_Buddha

    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    19,426
    Likes Received:
    10,320
    The problem is that power consumption doesn't scale linearly with clock speed, especially if the clock speed used is beyond the "knee of the curve" WRT power.

    It's safe to assume that the XBSX GPU core is below the knee of the curve. It's highly likely that the PS5 SOC is on the wrong side of the knee, hence necessitating variable clocks.

    On top of that the XBSX SOC being large means there's more surface area available to transfer heat off the SOC compared to the smaller PS5 SOC.

    Basically heat is a concern for both. We wouldn't be seeing that rather exotic V-shaped development box for PS5 if it didn't necessitate some interesting cooling solutions. In comparison the XBSX development boxes are housed in what are basically XBO-X boxes.

    Regards,
    SB
     
    Silenti, neckthrough, iroboto and 4 others like this.
  16. Xbat

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,650
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    Location:
    A farm in the middle of nowhere
    Which machine will be cheaper to make after first revision/ die shrink ?
     
  17. AbsoluteBeginner

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2019
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    1,301
    PS5. With revision on newer node that TDP will fall down sharper and cooling requirement will be smaller.
     
    PSman1700 likes this.
  18. Rangers

    Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    12,791
    Likes Received:
    1,596

    Bloomberg article told us they are worried about it though. To refresh on that: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-with-playstation-5-price-due-to-costly-parts

    To me there are two price scenarios vastly more likely than all others: They are the same price, or PS5 is less expensive by $50.
     
    PSman1700 likes this.
  19. PSman1700

    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2019
    Messages:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    3,093
    One can assume the PS5 is going to be cheaper, it looks like a 399 console, which makes sense as the PS4 at 399 was very successfull.
     
  20. tunafish

    Regular

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    627
    Likes Received:
    414
    More than just TDP/cooling issues, a node shrink probably gives a little bit more frequency headroom, which lets them claw back the parametric yields they lost due to clocking so high. In the long term, PS5 has a definitive cost advantage. I just think that on release day, the advantage will probably be a lot smaller than people would think.
     
    VitaminB6 and PSman1700 like this.
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...