epicstruggle said:I very rarely agree with guden on anything, but this is one area where we pretty much see the same way. Pornography is not good for society, it has not improved how people view women, it has not brough any benefit to those in the industry (other than financial).
There are several areas that it is quite detremental:
-It changes how the those who watch pornography view women as objects.
-The porn industry has moved from the seedy dark theaters to the mainstream. Now people aspire to be like the hooker in pretty women, a stripper, ...
-The explotation of women, use them while they are in their prime and then chuck them away.
I might add more later depending on how the conversation progresses.
later,
epic
Out of curiousity, how is a hooker or stripper in this case different than a pro-athlete? We really in many ways view them in them in the same way; No one really cares who the person is. People aspire to be like them, not because of the way they act (or perhaps inspite of it!), but because of their popularity and athletical powress. Not only that, but like you say, we use them while they are in their prime and then chuck them away as well. So I have to ask, what is the difference between a hooker or a pornography star and a pro-athlete when it comes down to it? Personally the only difference I can see is that the first is judged based on his/her looks and sexual performance. The second is based primarily on his/her athletic performance, with looks perhaps playing a smaller factor in popularity. In both cases though, society's view of the person is extremely shallow. This to me, points back to sex itself being the root of the problem. People don't think of pro-athletes as being exploited, or atleast don't care enough to make a big fuss about it. Pornography on the other hand causes a huge conflict.
Nite_Hawk