Crytek Presents: CRYSIS 3 [PS3, 360]
- Thread starter Reiko
- Start date
steveOrino
Regular
I agree, these comparisons while nice for curiosity sake are really boiling down to, "which looks marginally worse?". This engine is just one console generation too early imo (at least for the content they are using it for). Engine feature checklist is nice but if it looks like this in the end....
I am sure when the PS4 and Xbox whatever roll out it will be a much better match for its capabilities.
The jaggies on the tree I don't think has to do with the lower res, it seems a sort of artifact for some lower precisition effect for the light or transparancies on ps3, I can't be more precise, I'm not exactly an expret but the slight muddy aspect of ps3 suggest will have the same difference in res of the prequel.
Mmm but there:
to be honest this time ps3 resolution seems a bit better but I could wrong.
Maybe I'm mistaken but it sounds like your post contradicts itself? It looks like you go from saying the jaggies are due to lower precision lighting, then say the slightly muddy aspect suggests the same resolution difference as the prequel, but then you go on to say you think the PS3's resolution is better this time.
Looking the past comparison of ps3/360 version, ps3 seems more muddy compared crysis 3 beta in the same console. I don't say it's the same res of 360 but it seems slighty higher of cryisis 2. Obviously it's just my impression.Maybe I'm mistaken but it sounds like your post contradicts itself? It looks like you go from saying the jaggies are due to lower precision lighting, then say the slightly muddy aspect suggests the same resolution difference as the prequel, but then you go on to say you think the PS3's resolution is better this time.
Can you explain me the joke, I'm missing the point of this postOh never mind, I have seen now in the previews page; this stupid console war will never stopped even at the end of the generation.
Just poking fun at no one in particular.
No one is saying the latter anymore, and the whole parallel development of the PPE & XeCores @ IBM was just a neat thing to hear about in Takahashi's book.Just poking fun at no one in particular.
Don't worry, I'm just talking in general, I don't tried to blame anyone, to be honest.
L. Scofield
Veteran
XB360 footage. No spoilers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zcLP2REdug
A bit spoilery:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f37voQYu-4
Looks fantastic.
A bit spoilery:
Looks fantastic.
DuckThor Evil
Legend
Videos are gone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuFI0o6JaA8&list=UUFYlQ387QROfFMCIhxE-UKA&index=1
This one works. Crytek's engineers are wizards o_0
This one works. Crytek's engineers are wizards o_0
L. Scofield
Veteran
Kameradschaft
Regular
Played the first two levels yesterday at a friend...the difference in visual quality between the MP beta and the Campaign is HUGE, the amount of foliage is breathtaking, the awesome motion blur of Crysis 2 is in, the IQ is definitely sharper with less blur than the beta and more (thank god) AF, better textures and less pop up.
The game on the second level with all this great moving massive foliage and beautiful lighting is a sight to behold...game looks completely amazing.
Of course all this comes with a cost which is the frame-rate, surprisingly the first level of the game run worse than the foliage-heavy second mission, the disappointing thing is that while the game runs at a steady 30fps when there's no enemies around when a firefight begins the frame-rate turns to shit...if you kill all the enemies the frame-rate is back to steady 30fps, same thing happened in a lot of places in Crysis 2 and it's quite disappointing to see this problem (AI routines dragging down the performance I presume?) rear it's ugly face again.
All in all the game is the best looking game on the consoles right now but the frame-rate is sub-30fps in most firefights which is a big problem IMO.
The game on the second level with all this great moving massive foliage and beautiful lighting is a sight to behold...game looks completely amazing.
Of course all this comes with a cost which is the frame-rate, surprisingly the first level of the game run worse than the foliage-heavy second mission, the disappointing thing is that while the game runs at a steady 30fps when there's no enemies around when a firefight begins the frame-rate turns to shit...if you kill all the enemies the frame-rate is back to steady 30fps, same thing happened in a lot of places in Crysis 2 and it's quite disappointing to see this problem (AI routines dragging down the performance I presume?) rear it's ugly face again.
All in all the game is the best looking game on the consoles right now but the frame-rate is sub-30fps in most firefights which is a big problem IMO.
L. Scofield
Veteran
The game is very optimized. It's just that consoles can't handle it.
I'm pretty sure Crysis 3 is about as optimized as you can get, these consoles
are probably just showing their age.
the art looks a lot better now then the previous crysis.
i hope my pc still able to run it in decent quality.
i cant play it on Xbox due to no KB+M support (i cant play but it will be frustrating).
i hope my pc still able to run it in decent quality.
i cant play it on Xbox due to no KB+M support (i cant play but it will be frustrating).
http://www.joystiq.com/2013/03/03/yerli-crysis-3-was-up-and-running-on-wii-u-was-very-close-to/
Crysis 3 was already made to run on Wii U too, but the work got wasted when EA & Nintendo couldn't get in agreement about some things
Crysis 3 was already made to run on Wii U too, but the work got wasted when EA & Nintendo couldn't get in agreement about some things
Similar threads
