Guden Oden said:
The Baron said:
that's a pretty stupid thing to say.
No, in my experience it fits ye average movie critic perfectly.
They're just people after all. There's nothing that says just because they see 200 movies/year, they somehow get better at expressing personal taste. If you practice skateboarding enough for example, you can do amazing tricks after a while, but you can't practice
watching movies.
Your argument is like saying that you can judge the quality of any classical pianist after hearing five or ten pianists in your entire life. It doesn't work that way. For example, there's Lang Lang, current wunderkind of the music world. Guess what? He's nothing amazing, despite the near-infinite levels of hype--he can play really fast and he can play really loud, and
that's it! Of course, to your average person, fast and loud equals good, but pianists and informed listeners know that it doesn't work that way. Same is true for any art form, including movies.
Shocking, I know--movies are more than entertainment.