O Ooh-videogames Regular Feb 25, 2006 #1 http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...=Nintendo.ASNM.&OS=AN/Nintendo&RS=AN/Nintendo http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...=Nintendo.ASNM.&OS=AN/Nintendo&RS=AN/Nintendo
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...=Nintendo.ASNM.&OS=AN/Nintendo&RS=AN/Nintendo http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...=Nintendo.ASNM.&OS=AN/Nintendo&RS=AN/Nintendo
L Li Mu Bai Regular Feb 25, 2006 #2 Ooh-videogames said: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...=Nintendo.ASNM.&OS=AN/Nintendo&RS=AN/Nintendo http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...=Nintendo.ASNM.&OS=AN/Nintendo&RS=AN/Nintendo Click to expand... Interesting find, reading through & digesting these now.
Ooh-videogames said: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...=Nintendo.ASNM.&OS=AN/Nintendo&RS=AN/Nintendo http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...=Nintendo.ASNM.&OS=AN/Nintendo&RS=AN/Nintendo Click to expand... Interesting find, reading through & digesting these now.
O Ooh-videogames Regular Feb 25, 2006 #3 Li Mu Bai said: Interesting find, reading through & digesting these now. Click to expand... The increase in indirect texturing units is intriguing. Notice the focus on FSAA, it purpose seems to be geared towards there decision to pass up HD resolutions.
Li Mu Bai said: Interesting find, reading through & digesting these now. Click to expand... The increase in indirect texturing units is intriguing. Notice the focus on FSAA, it purpose seems to be geared towards there decision to pass up HD resolutions.
N NANOTEC Banned Feb 25, 2006 #4 Nice find. Does Tim Van Hook still work at ATI Research? Or does Nintendo own all the patents related to Hollywood? Last edited by a moderator: Feb 25, 2006
Nice find. Does Tim Van Hook still work at ATI Research? Or does Nintendo own all the patents related to Hollywood?
U Urian Regular Feb 25, 2006 #5 This first patent is an update of the Flipper patent, the update is from 18 March 2005: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph...+Hook;+Timothy+J"&RS=IN/"Van+Hook;+Timothy+J" An expansion of the indirect texturing from Flipper: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph...+Hook;+Timothy+J"&RS=IN/"Van+Hook;+Timothy+J" It seems that all this patents are the complete version of the Flipper pattents, you only need to see the Cross Reference section from the first patent.
This first patent is an update of the Flipper patent, the update is from 18 March 2005: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph...+Hook;+Timothy+J"&RS=IN/"Van+Hook;+Timothy+J" An expansion of the indirect texturing from Flipper: http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph...+Hook;+Timothy+J"&RS=IN/"Van+Hook;+Timothy+J" It seems that all this patents are the complete version of the Flipper pattents, you only need to see the Cross Reference section from the first patent.
T Ty Roberta E. Lee Veteran Feb 25, 2006 #6 Err, how do we know these are Revolution patents? Edit - Urian beat me to it.
