Best sex EVA!11!!

[Althornin]

Killing is more acceptable for the children to see than fucking ? :?
Would you rather see your child kill someone than to "fuck" someone

exactly.
The prudishness of "america" in general is amazing.
Its funny how our news can show horrendous violence but not an ass or a tit.
Fucking stupid.

 

[Guden Oden]

where did i say guns in homes are ok??? By the looks of it, reading/comprehension skills in sweeden have taken a nose dive.

And where did I say you said guns in homes are okay, you fucking boob?

Sheesh, and you accuse ME of lack of comprehension skills? Pathetic...

 

[epicstruggle]

where did i say guns in homes are ok??? By the looks of it, reading/comprehension skills in sweeden have taken a nose dive.

And where did I say you said guns in homes are okay, you fucking boob?

Sheesh, and you accuse ME of lack of comprehension skills? Pathetic...

lmao, i must have touched a nerve, youve called me pathetic in every thread i show you up.

epic

 

[rabidrabbit]

See, wouldn't it be better if you guys just fucked each other, instead of fighting.
It would make everyone feel much better.

 

[epicstruggle]

See, wouldn't it be better if you guys just fucked each other, instead of fighting.
It would make everyone feel much better.

make love not war.

 

[AlNom]

one fist full of love comin right up

 

[Natoma]

one fist full of love comin right up

Careful. You'll get london-boy excited.

 

[John Reynolds]

Careful. You'll get london-boy excited.

My damn chiropractor walked into the patient's room yesterday while pulling on a plastic glove and saying, "OK, let's get this over with." Of course not to be outdone I threw myself over the table with a "Oh, god yes, a digital exam!!"

 

[AlNom]

Careful. You'll get london-boy excited.

 

[hey69]

ehem : http://download.ifilm.com/qt/portal/2644207_200.mov 8)

don't worry guys, it's censored

 

[Bambers]

Downside is that children as young as 13 attended the open concert, and some of them may have been a _little_ offended by the rather graphic and loud performance..

I doubt the children would have been offended, the parents of the children would be the ones being offended

 

[K.I.L.E.R]

Killing is more acceptable for the children to see than fucking ? :?
Would you rather see your child kill someone than to "fuck" someone

exactly.
The prudishness of "america" in general is amazing.
Its funny how our news can show horrendous violence but not an ass or a tit.
Fucking stupid.

I don't think fucking someone is the same as just showing an ass or tit.

 

[zidane1strife]

Downside is that children as young as 13 attended the open concert, and some of them may have been a _little_ offended by the rather graphic and loud performance..

Good for them, most children have been exposed to pornography at that age in this day and age. Those whose parents are overprotective and deny them of the net, and friends(only way you could actually get someone to not know of sex by that age), deserve to have their eyes open. Sexuality is part of human nature, and we must cherish it. All this embarrassment, all this fear and importance given to such a simple act is ridiculous. Thankfully the new generations appear to be learning, and are enjoying their sexuality outside the confines of institutions like marriage.

In this century stds, and pregnancy is to fall under our control. With advanced modifications of the brain, a sexual experience will no longer be traumatic, shocking or as important. With no consequence then it follows, there's no need for limitations. Communities akin to those of nudist will arise, only instead of just being nude in those communities they'll actively participate in sexual activities in such communities.

If i was a parent of a 13 year old, i would be offended by this. Nudity isnt harmful, but it should be up to the parent to decide whether or not i want my child exposed to it. If there was no heads up on this then someone should get in trouble for it.

Uh huh, what are you to do? You'd have to be pretty controlling and prohibit many a friends. It only takes a few minutes to give special favors, even the most respectable looking friends can do so, and if yer kids wants'em you'll have to pretty much lock him up to stop him. That is reality my friend, pornographic material is now ubiquitous, and even sexual activity is becoming so... The only thing stopping it are stds, and pregnancy... but those will fall this very century.

why don't we seeing more masturbating womand and fucking couples on FA and Bounty commercials at 6pm on tv?

Because of irrational inhibitions. Even in japan there's still some inhibition, but it will FALL.

I think in about 10-20 years we will.

Good to see some are already seeing what's to come.

exactly.
The prudishness of "america" in general is amazing.
Its funny how our news can show horrendous violence but not an ass or a tit.
Fucking stupid.

Indeed.

I doubt the children would have been offended, the parents of the children would be the ones being offended

That is most likely. They'd have to be some homeschooled-fundie freaks basically to be offended.

 

[Kaizer]

Sexuality is part of human nature, and we must cherish it.

In this century stds, and pregnancy is to fall under our control. With advanced modifications of the brain, a sexual experience will no longer be traumatic, shocking or as important. With no consequence then it follows, there's no need for limitations. Communities akin to those of nudist will arise, only instead of just being nude in those communities they'll actively participate in sexual activities in such communities.

So, what are you trying to say? :?
That because sex is natural, enjoyable and free, everybody at any age should be having it as often as they can with whoever they can find?

Pardon my making assumptions, but do you think everybody in every society could stand for this? Do you think every issue connected to sex will "fall under our control"? STDs are still constitute a major problem in a large part of our world, have you ever heard of third world countries (making a broad generalisation here, to keep things comprehensible), have you ever heard of AIDS? And that is just one issue..

Of course it would change our society a lot if sex became totally casual, and we could behave like [insert name of a kind of monkeys for which I cannot remember the correct English term, but who "sleep with" everybody within their own flock as a gesture when they meet or as a sort of "hello"]. But to the better or worse?
Isn't the position of sex in our society too fundamental to alter so dramaticly?

I think conservative powers are too strong to alter this, hell even I, wonder if this would be so great at all.. (and I scored -8.00, -4.39 on the political ideology test, meaning I should be on your side of the middle.)

If there is one thing one can learn from history, it is that the future can never be accurately predicted. Are you sure that this sexification thing will not become old? Because I think in some ways you are mistaking the sexification of the western society for liberation.
The popular "everthing is sex, because sex sells" line of marketing will some day beat itself to death.

But your arguments sure made me think the topic through, so not all was bad, everything taken into account..




Ah, well, what do I know. In the end, it seems, the world seems to out-do even the most liberal and free spirited of us..
I already look forward to my conservative days of "When I was young, we didn't have rocks, so when we went down to the river to do laundry, we had to bang our clothes agains our heads to force the water out of them"..


Kind regards.
Kjetil

 

[zidane1strife]

Do you think every issue connected to sex will "fall under our control"? STDs are still constitute a major problem in a large part of our world, have you ever heard of third world countries (making a broad generalisation here, to keep things comprehensible), have you ever heard of AIDS? And that is just one issue..

You've not a remote idea of the advances that are taking place right now... the simplest of stuff that's in the labs, could very well result in things like commercial regrowth of teeth, cure for the crippled, in about a decade. That's just the tip of the iceberg. The combined advances in computing, in genetic engineering and screening tools, in nano-tech, in functional genomics, etc, etc... Make for an exciting time.

The thing is the amount of stuff that's going to arrive this century is beyond belief... just read my sig, although a bit too optimistic, it's quite plausible, and that my friend is what's amazing.

Pardon my making assumptions, but do you think everybody in every society could stand for this?

Obviously not everybody, that's why I said akin to NUDISTS, communities would arise. Now those interested could go into such communities, just like those interested in nudism go to them right now.

Isn't the position of sex in our society too fundamental to alter so dramaticly?

No it is the consequence of the combination of the flynn effect, and the global communications network. If this is as it seems, then it cannot be stopped.

If there is one thing one can learn from history, it is that the future can never be accurately predicted. Are you sure that this sexification thing will not become old? Because I think in some ways you are mistaking the sexification of the western society for liberation.
The popular "everthing is sex, because sex sells" line of marketing will some day beat itself to death.

No this is not related if this does occur it will be something some will do, who knows for how long, they might even genetically modify themselves to increase libido.

In any case that's an example. Another is what's to occur once advanced regenerative medicine comes of age. Some might choose to undergo serious mutilations and remove their arms or legs, until they lost consciousness from the pain. Given that they could regenarte limbs they might continue to do so, as a form of masochistic expression.

 

[Bambers]

If there is one thing one can learn from history, it is that the future can never be accurately predicted. Are you sure that this sexification thing will not become old? Because I think in some ways you are mistaking the sexification of the western society for liberation.
The popular "everthing is sex, because sex sells" line of marketing will some day beat itself to death.

it probably will, these things always go in cycles.

 

[Kaizer]

You've not a remote idea of the advances that are taking place right now.

You're quite correct.

The thing is the amount of stuff that's going to arrive this century is beyond belief... just read my sig, although a bit too optimistic, it's quite plausible, and that my friend is what's amazing.

If this development follows though, I agree we could very soon (in terms of centuries) see a complete change in the demographic and political setup of the world, but I still see a few things that may slow this process down.

Capitalism, for example, makes big multinational companies able to charge insane prices for vital AIDS/HIV medicines. These medicines are at the same time being manufactured (in the form of reverse engineered copies) and sold at a fraction of the price in countries with less protective patent-laws, such as India.
Though I am far to the left of the political scale, I will not plunge further into a rant on my views on capitalism, so I leave it with this example.

the simplest of stuff that's in the labs, could very well result in things like commercial regrowth of teeth, cure for the crippled, in about a decade. That's just the tip of the iceberg. The combined advances in computing, in genetic engineering and screening tools, in nano-tech, in functional genomics, etc, etc... Make for an exciting time.

My question is, however, will this be offered affordably to the masses?
Will more or less religiously bound governments allow or try to prevent research in these fields?
It is obvious what is to the benefit of Man if we look at it your way, but is our world mature enough to follow this developement in a productive way?

Obviously not everybody, that's why I said akin to NUDISTS, communities would arise. Now those interested could go into such communities, just like those interested in nudism go to them right now.

I completely misinterpreted this part when reading it originally, probably based on own predjudices or something like that.
I agree that this could be a possible developement, and it sort of puts many of the arguments from my previous post aside.

No it is the consequence of the combination of the flynn effect, and the global communications network. If this is as it seems, then it cannot be stopped.

Here, I begin to feel "thinly read" (as Eddie Izzard would put it). Could you explain the flynn effect further or point me to a good resource?

No this is not related if this does occur it will be something some will do, who knows for how long, they might even genetically modify themselves to increase libido.

I assume that "this" in this context is the "akin to nudist free sex societies". If I am right, I do not object to you reasoning.

In any case that's an example. Another is what's to occur once advanced regenerative medicine comes of age. Some might choose to undergo serious mutilations and remove their arms or legs, until they lost consciousness from the pain. Given that they could regenarte limbs they might continue to do so, as a form of masochistic expression.

I hope that one will only be for the rich and bored..

Anyways, I understand how you drew your conclusions in the first post now, and though I didn't agree with everything, I must say I am too intrigued by the possibilities of advanced medicine in the not too distant future.. We may have seen nothing yet

With regards
Kjetil

 

[hey69]

ok guys, this topic started with BEST SEX EVA and it ended in some political shit

 

[nutball]

ok guys, this topic started with BEST SEX EVA and it ended in some political shit

Ummm... welcome to B3D.

 

[zidane1strife]

My question is, however, will this be offered affordably to the masses?
Will more or less religiously bound governments allow or try to prevent research in these fields?

Automation allows for a job-less society, things would be virtually free. We'd just have to hope people choose an acceptable solution to this dilemma... worst case most could end up in slums separated from the lucky few by automated killing machines.... hopefully that wont happen.

Though, yes it is true that things could go wrong, but we've just got to hope. Change is coming, and it seems like it cannot be stopped. Technological development is auto-catalytic, it goes ever faster, as evidenced by history. Governments can't stop it, the one that does will fall pray to the others. A country that achieves suitably advanced nanotech, will in a short time eclipse the military might of all the combined countries of the earth. Thus we're forced to proceed, or to yield to those who proceed.

It is obvious what is to the benefit of Man if we look at it your way, but is our world mature enough to follow this developement in a productive way?

The time of man is coming to an end, for as you should realize, man cannot handle these. It is time for transcendence to take place.

Could you explain the flynn effect further or point me to a good resource?

It is something I've heard about, IQ scores of the average human are rising, and particularly it is not in culturally influenced things, like verbal or mathematical skills... But it is in the areas of abstract reasoning. This change, it seems has been increasing in speed. Aided by gm and nanotech this slope will become asymptotical, the end of humanity is near, were at the dawn of posthumanity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect

I assume that "this" in this context is the "akin to nudist free sex societies". If I am right, I do not object to you reasoning.

Correct.