I hope I'm not too late with this reply. Anyway, I have done some extensive research before buying mine and finally decided on one player.
For me, the most important priority was sound quality. Around 8 years ago, I had a portable Sharp Minidisc and the soundquality was unbeatable. The bass was strong and responsive and most importantly didn't distort. After that one, I then switched to Sony portables due to better smaller size and longer batterylife (aswell as a more sleek design). Let me just say that since then, I have went through a couple of Sony Minidiscs and for all I love the company and their classy products, I wouldn't recommend any of their portable music products ever again. The sound quality is crap and easily distorts, even with good headphones. The output is far too weak, meaning that if the source wasn't digital - it will most likely not be loud enough.
After starting using a laptop and listening to music while work times, I never thought I would ever be able to enjoy good sound while being on the run ever again. Being sceptial and haunted by memories of my beloved Sharp Minidisc, I then started looking for a new MP3/HD based portable.
After a bit of research, these are the players I finally checked out:
- Creative ZEN Jukebox
- iPod
- iRiver iHP-120
One day, I checked out a store that had all 3 players in stock and was ready for a good comparasment using my own music (consists of music in the genre of goa/psychadelic, smooth jazz, bigbeats, ambient and some recent pop music) and my own headphones (which for the record is the
Sony MDR-EX71SL (but the older model) (<-- which btw, i very much recommend)
Anyway, here is more or less what I gathered when comparing the 3:
Creative ZEN Jukebox
The ZEN was my most anticipated player. The reviews seems quite good and I was convinced by a few reviews that this player was the one with the best soundquality. The tech. specs also seemed to confirm this.
I started of with some of my goa stuff, which incase you never heard of, is atmospheric electronic music (techno), similar to progressive but features psychadelic effects, usually good use of stereo type effects and a few 'real' instruments such as gittars (sp?), drums etc. It's very rythmic stuff with a lot of bass - exactly the best thing to check out how responsive the bass is and how easily it distorts.
The ZEN left a pretty good impression in this regard. With the equalizer switched off and normal settings, the bass was sufficient and didn't seem to distort. Even when turning up the volume, it seemed to be fairly capable. Certainly much better than the Sony portables I've experienced the last few years, so I really didn't have any reason to complain.
The draw-backs were quite evident though: didn't quite like the browsing tool (basically, what enables you to browse through folders in search of the music you want to play). On the other hand, the player in itself is quite big, especially compared to the iRiver and the iPod. Still, my highest concern was sound quality, so size really wasn't an issue.
then, I went on to the
iRiver iHP-120
Going through the same set of music like the ZEN, one thing became quite evident really quick: the sound quality was spectacular. I was quite blown away actually. I thought the ZEN was good, but the iRiver beats it flat out - easily. I was that amazed by the sound that I started playing around with it. Upped the bass settings and the volume and amazingly, it didn't distort at all. On thing though; as you turn the player louder, it will turn back the bass acoardingly slightly to prevent distortion. It's hardly noticable and only really when you have the bass on its highest settings.
The size of the player is quite small - in fact, contrary to it looking bulky, I found it quite suprising to be just slightly larger than the sleek iPod next to it. The display is nice and big and has a cool blu-ish backlight. One thing that I didn't like though, is most definately the joystick in the middle of the player. While it enables the user to operate all functions with one hand, it just didn't fair too well with me, probably because I usually have bad experience with joysticks (especially the one on my cell-phones). Another thing that striked me as bad was the uneffeciant display. While browsing tracks, the characters are displayed far too large for my liking. If your albums names consists of a few long words (mine are basically "LABEL - ALBUM NAME (BITRATE)" or "ARTIST - ALBUM (BITRATE)" - you often only see the first word, often the label or the artists name. If you have a few albums off the same label or artist, you have to wait till the words scroll so that you can read which album it is. This could have been avoided easily with a smaller font.
On the other hand, the settings you can change are quite amazing. Balance, equalizers, SRS, bass, treble and lots more. Biggest drawback: the price. The iRiver was by a lot, the most expensive player.
after the iRiver, I finally checked out the
iPod
It's stylish - in fact the most stylish player on the market. Easily. Still, headphones in, music on the player and I was disgusted to say the least. It's by far the weakest player in regard to output volume and with that, the bass in itself is weak. The sound quality itself may be better than the ZEN, but it in no way beats the iRiver. In fact, I was so disgusted by it, I ditched going through all sound genres and gave it up. Yeah, sound quality is a big factor for me, so it left me no choice but to get back to the iRiver. Sorry to all that may feel offended by my opinion on the iPod, but it's definately not my player. Since then, I had a closer look at it (a friend has one) and the style is incredible. My portables hide in my pocket though, so I can't say it would bother me not having a stylish player.
From what I gathered, the iPod also requires software such as iTunes to copy music on to the player, though I heard some reports that this can be cracked. Officially though, the iRiver is the only one of the 3 that is capable of copying music onto it without any additional software. Connect it to your laptop/computer and you'll see it like a external mass-storage device and you can use it as such. The Creative also, requires software and can't be used as such (as far as i know).
After this comparasment, the choice was clear and I got the
iRiver iHP-120 the weak after that. There is a larger variant out, the iHP-140 which features a 40GB hd, but in turn, it's also slightly larger, which is why I went for the smaller model. The prices of both variants are pretty close though, so someone out for the best bang for your back, may be better off with the 40 GB variant.
The price of the player is, admittedly, the highest and that by a large margin. In my opinion and after the comparasment I made, the price is worth it though. Let me state why:
- the size of the player is quite compact - looks bulky, but is infact not much bigger than an iPod
- the only player that also supports OGG files
- has a built in FM radio
- is able to record directly from the radio in either WAV or MP3 (all constant bitrates supported)
- has a line out
- has a line in
- only player with both an optical in and out
- best soundquality among all mp3 players
- has a built in microphone (can also record either WAV/MP3 directly from it)
- can be used as a mass-storage device (no software required)
- extensive equalizer and SRS
- comes with a soft-case for the player, required cables and a mic (? not sure anymore about that though)
- can read txt files
- should support winamp music lists
though)
- play length is quite good (I get on my 256kbps+ bitrates albums over 8 hours with high volumens and constant fast forwarding etc).
- firmware updates possible
If there are any other aspects you like covered, drop a line and I'll try to answer them. I am aware that there are other mp3 models too and while I didn't test them all, I do have a fair idea about the others too. Cheers Phil