https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Murray_(actor) Not getting the reference, was it something he was in?The problem I have with Elon is he's the transport version of Sean Murray
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Murray_(actor) Not getting the reference, was it something he was in?The problem I have with Elon is he's the transport version of Sean Murray
huh, its prolly 100x cheaper.The problem with expanding our spaced based activities /economy is cost per kilogramme to orbit. This is the thing that hasn't really moved on much since the 70's. For heavy lift it's gone backward if anything.
huh, its prolly 100x cheaper.
And this is inflation adjusted (which is inaccurate personally, truer number is prolly adjust to GDP or someit)
He was a Dev on No Mans Sky who promised the moon on a stick....Not getting the reference, was it something he was in?
How would you know? the only thing he's delivered on is tesla (well not really remember he promised by 2020 when your not using your tesla you can turn it into an autonomous taxi and it could earn you upto $30,000 a year)In that that initial product is far less than promised but a few years down the line it's really good.
OK cheers, I know the thing/meme from 2/3 years ago. but the funny thing was ppl were putting words into his mouthHe was a Dev on No Mans Sky who promised the moon on a stick....
mate space has pork, you think the shuttle is bad, now pull up a chair and let me tell you about the SLS, this is just how its always beenI'd really like to see cost worldwide per actual kg over time, include launchers outside of the US too and ignore the Shuttle as it has too much pork attached. You can't really get at that data sadly.
mate space has pork, you think the shuttle is bad, now pull up a chair and let me tell you about the SLS, this is just how its always been
Im waiting for him to start transporting people on holiday via rocket at a price cheaper than air travel
yes I know /sEdit: Also while Branson & Bezos got a bunch of press recently for their incredibly expensive roller coaster rides, the fact that Musk could hop on the next flight to ISS but hasn't is much more impressive IMO.
Yes, I thought that was a bit... lame and overblown. I don't see a future in it, either. Starship at least is supposed to be used for real transportation of people and stuff. The only purpose of those other "toys" is only to offer a few seconds of microgravity and that's it.yes I know /s
Hows that impressive? hes too smart, theres prolly a ~1% chance of dying. Actually I was shocked with bezos doing it TBH, branson wasnt a surprise though as anything to get his name in lights. But unlike Musk neither of these 2 struck me as particularly smart(sure no doubt smarter than me and most folks but not rocket scientists)
The hilarious thing was they werent even the first billionaire space tourist, that was some guy (from texas I think) who went up to the ISS many years ago.
I assume both of their endeavours are gonna fail as in space tourism, I mean who wants to go up for a couple of minutes? A couple of hours, sure thats worth risking your life but a couple of minutes, yeah nah.
Excu... you what?!!?! You're a fucking genius!! Your story should be heard by the nations.Personally I think my feat of being the first person to fart this millennium is more impressive
I know right, its my crowning glory .. I even stuck it on my resumeExcu... you what?!!?! You're a fucking genius!! Your story should be heard by the nations.
Emphasis on the fact Spacex has a proper legit orbital crew rocket.Hows that impressive?
Allowing people to get high quality internet all over the globe at what is really a reasonable price is pretty awesome. Shotwell deserves large kudos for SpaceX as well. He is undoubtedly a hype man, but SpaceX and starlink are both interesting to me.He was a Dev on No Mans Sky who ...
Starlink plans to encircle the globe with 40,000 satellites that will have to be replaced every 3 to 4 years. People are going to have to buy a ground station for about $500 then pay $100 a month about 2x the price of cable so there needs to be enough customers who have no other means of internet apart from satellite to pay for the bandwidth and the building and launching of 40k satellites every 4 years are their enough people in rural areas in rich enough countries to pay for all of this ? plus im worried that starlink will render low earth orbit unusable - see the kessler syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome
Dont even get me started on hyperloop :
I looked into this before, no it won’t be, it’ll be pretty pisspoor internet, I suppose though they will just have to update their satellites in 5 years time and hope the others come crashing down as planned. I suppose it’s ok atm with just musk and somewhat Amazon, but what happens when there’s over a dozen companies all with 1000s of satellites providing this service, just a disaster wAiting to happen. And with bezos animosity towards musk I wouldn’t be surprised if an ‘accident’ occursIt may be high quality internet now but will it be if it gets enough users to make it commercially viable ?