Don't have use for AA? I don't understand why you wouldn't?
Well it's really simple, due to the distance i play from the monitor at 1900*1200 and in motion alias is not easy to see. I even did a test with multiple games using people very sensitive to it from that distance, they couldn't reliably tell what setting was being used, except when using post process AA. I take the shots i find interesting from gameplay sessions. Im not someone that goes through the game pumping AA to unplayable levels to take some shots.Maybe he is oversampling to 1080p on a smaller monitor, but the screenshots don't reflect that.
Well it's really simple, due to the distance i play from the monitor at 1900*1200 and in motion alias is not easy to see. I even did a test with multiple games using people very sensitive to it from that distance, they couldn't reliably tell what setting was being used, except when using post process AA. I take the shots i find interesting from gameplay sessions. Im not someone that goes through the game pumping AA to unplayable levels to take some shots.
60 fps? The game is ran at 24 fps here, can't get 60. The output device is just a PC monitor, played maybe at 4-5 ' away.16:10 implies not using a HDTV so what are you using that you are so far back from may I ask? Just curious.
Of course if you have to turn off any AA whatsoever to get good frame rates then I understand. But if you have to turn off AA in HL2 to get 60fps, I'd be considering a PC upgrade
Hey you better check with crytek before posting screens of crysis 4
Can a GTX Titan run Crysis yet? Or maybe do we have to wait for 10nm GPUs.
Can a GTX Titan run Crysis yet? Or maybe do we have to wait for 10nm GPUs.
Yes, digital foundry tested it recently at max details and 1440p I believe and and still hit well over 60fps.
They didn't say that, still dips at 1440p and 60fps is only available with AA disabled.
Which wouldn't class as Max
Screen Space Indirect Lighting.