leoneazzurro
Regular
Maybe this is interesting...
Anandtech just launched a newspiece claiming SK Hynix still hasn't started mass production of HBM2, so RX Vega is definitely coming with Samsung HBM.Too many messages to quote, but it's 99.99% sure that Vega uses Samsung HBM, not SK Hynix, at least for the 16 GB models
Too many messages to quote, but it's 99.99% sure that Vega uses Samsung HBM, not SK Hynix, at least for the 16 GB models
https://instinct.radeon.com/en-us/p47-announcement/To bring Project 47 to life, AMD worked closely with Samsung Electronics with respect to the HBM2 memory used across the “Vega”-based product lines including the Radeon Instinct MI25 accelerators.
Little more context on that quote. So looks like Samsung HBM2.To bring Project 47 to life, AMD worked closely with Samsung Electronics with respect to the HBM2 memory used across the “Vega”-based product lines including the Radeon Instinct MI25 accelerators. Samsung also provided high-performance NVMe SSD storage and high-speed DDR4 memory to enable the 1 PetaFLOPS of performance. AMD also collaborated with Mellanox Technologies, leveraging their InfiniBand solution to deliver 100Gb connectivity through the rack.
Anandtech just launched a newspiece claiming SK Hynix still hasn't started mass production of HBM2, so RX Vega is definitely coming with Samsung HBM.
So, I guess that puts the "AMD is getting exclusive access to 1GHz chips" rumour to rest.
Sorry about that. The URL to the earnings call transcript was screwed up.Unfortunately, Anton messed up the source link - or is that his way of telling us there is no source but original content?
Sorry about that. The URL to the earnings call transcript was screwed up.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/40...-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single
The complete relevant passage, which was in response to an institutional investor question:
"And compared to the GDDR5, it is clear that both products would have price premium over it. And although I cannot specify the exact pricing that we expect, I can tell you that the customers are willing to pay at least double or, let's say, 2.5 times of the HBM."
Maybe this is interesting...
I find the mellanox-part more intriguing - so they're not leveraging their own infinity farbric beyond MCM?Little more context on that quote. So looks like Samsung HBM2.
AMD's fabric so far has demonstrated going as far as a second CPU socket. Since it's based on Hypertransport, this seems consistent with it being an interconnect within components of the same board.I find the mellanox-part more intriguing - so they're not leveraging their own infinity farbric beyond MCM?
Thanks for looking into it, Ryan and thanks for reporting on it in the first place as well!Sorry about that. The URL to the earnings call transcript was screwed up.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/40...-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single
The complete relevant passage, which was in response to an institutional investor question:
"And compared to the GDDR5, it is clear that both products would have price premium over it. And although I cannot specify the exact pricing that we expect, I can tell you that the customers are willing to pay at least double or, let's say, 2.5 times of the HBM."
Thanks for looking into it, Ryan and thanks for reporting on it in the first place as well!
But i must say, the wording from seeking alpha is a little unclear to me - not being a native speaker, i would expect him to say "for the HBM" if he meant to compare to GDDR5 and "of the HBM(2)" if he meant to compare HBM gen2 to HBM gen1. Maybe someone with a better grasp of the english language can help me out here?
He doesn't appear to be a native English speaker either, which coupled with the on-the-fly nature of earnings call Q&A responses, is what leads to the odd structure of the statement.Thanks for looking into it, Ryan and thanks for reporting on it in the first place as well!
But i must say, the wording from seeking alpha is a little unclear to me - not being a native speaker, i would expect him to say "for the HBM" if he meant to compare to GDDR5 and "of the HBM(2)" if he meant to compare HBM gen2 to HBM gen1. Maybe someone with a better grasp of the english language can help me out here?
It reads like it was translated or spoken by a Korean, which isn't unreasonable, so you likely understand as much as everyone else here.But i must say, the wording from seeking alpha is a little unclear to me - not being a native speaker, i would expect him to say "for the HBM" if he meant to compare to GDDR5 and "of the HBM(2)" if he meant to compare HBM gen2 to HBM gen1. Maybe someone with a better grasp of the english language can help me out here?
Native English speaker here, and the last sentence is rather awkward.
He doesn't appear to be a native English speaker either, which coupled with the on-the-fly nature of earnings call Q&A responses, is what leads to the odd structure of the statement.