Performance comparison talk moved to more appropriate discusssion: https://forum.beyond3d.com/threads/speculation-gpu-performance-comparisons-of-2020-spawn.61885/
Like the "separate RT co-processor"?i think Coreteks usually has some true leaked info but just mixes some pieces.
Thats probably one of his most unlucky ones AFAIK, and why i said "usually"...for a leaker, don´t know about his sources though.Like the "separate RT co-processor"?
It is one.should be navi 22
They're shitlording on social media alright.teasing is starting
They will sale again at cost (ie like Radeon Pro VII) to compete with new NV aggressive RTX3080, which is exactly what they don't want. What's the point to sale this expensive silicon at bargain price when it can generate huge margins with server CPU?What if ... the "big navi" Navi 21 80/72Cus is HBM2 16GB/12GB RX 6900?
Atta boy.much cheaper RTX30 G6x
Ha.G6 will give their products a huge bandwidth disadvantage...
On the other side, what solution do they have ? G6x is for now Nvidia exclusive and using G6 will give their products a huge bandwidth disadvantage... I'm curious to see what AMD will bring this time to re-enter the high-end market...
They're measured board to board so if there's any, they'd be accounted for.but we don't know if AMD is counting any memory improvements into its 50% RDNA1->RDNA2 performance per watt gain figure.
The answer is very simple: they don't.But question is then how could they offer 16GB with 384-bit GDDR6 bus?
Yeah.AMD could posibly go the same route as nvidia with 384-bit so 12GB/24GB
512b with slow GDDR6 ftw. R600 and Hawaii are both legends.
16x1 ? seems like a expensive way to get 896 GB/s512b with slow GDDR6 ftw. R600 and Hawaii are both legends.
Yeah, but the reality is more hilarious than that.Make sense?
Yeah just use HBM.16x1 ? seems like a expensive way to get 896 GB/s