About buses. INTEL/AMD

patroclus02

Newcomer
Hello!
I just want to make sure.

Intel, for core2duo platform, uses a single FSB of up to 1066MHz, to connect CPU to northbridge and memory.
So, if memory is 800Mhz, and, in hypothetical situation, all bandwidth is being used, there would be 266Mhz left for northbridge comunication.

AMD CPUs are connected to northbridge using hypertransport at 800 or 1000MHz (dual rate, so effective data transfers is 1600 or 2000MHz).
While, FSB is dedicated to memory accesses, working at the same freq as the memory. So, a 800Mhz memory would deliver 12.8Gb/s max (dual channel).
Adding a 2000Mhz HT bus, that can move 4 bytes per clock, we get 8Gb/s

Adding both together, we get 20,8Gb/s
While core2duo delivers a max bandwidth of 17Gb/s (dual channel, 800MHz memory). But northbridge comunication isn't dual channle, is it? If it isn't dual channel, only 8 bytes per clock can be moved (64 bit bus), so max bandwidth of 8,5Gb/s for northbrige exclusively.

AMD beats Intel here, because:
- More bandwith, and separate buses.
- Integrated mem controller.

BUT, even though, core2duo beats X2.
Imagine a mem controller and HT in core2duo :LOL:
Terrific ;)
 
sandra-bw.gif


cpuz-latency.gif
 
Even for winrar and games, core 2 duo whipes out AMD X2...
I've been an AMD fan since I was 13 years old, but I'm building a PC now, and I'll choose a core 2 duo. Great arquitecture. I'm sure AMD will come back :D

Common System Interface , I did not know about it... cool idea.
 
Intel has the shared & large L2 combined with apparently very good predictive pre-fetch populating the L2 with potentially useful stuff, both of which reduce the amount of time the core sits around waiting for data to process.
 
Back
Top