About Adrianne

Nvidia said it themselves that human models are hardest to do/render because we see problems/imperfections because we're pretty much experts on our own speciies. Maybe I stare at female rearends too much but her rearend proportions seems a bit off to me. :)
 
People would think nvidia guys are perverts if they made a fictional character with nipples, but since shes based on a real person theres a good reason for them being there :p

Could you please explain to me whats wrong with nipples? I dont understand why you would make a fuzz about nipples or breasts or whatever. But than again, im not american.
 
Could you please explain to me whats wrong with nipples? I dont understand why you would make a fuzz about nipples or breasts or whatever. But than again, im not american.

Thats a question from a answer which is the answer to your question :D

ps. I never said I had a problem with nipples.
 
The problem with these demos is that the "real" Adrianne Curry is actually also computer-generated. Looking like her and looking like a real person are mututally incompatible goals. ;)
 
The problem with these demos is that the "real" Adrianne Curry is actually also computer-generated. Looking like her and looking like a real person are mututally incompatible goals. ;)

Shes not super human, shes not even that pretty, its called make up and lighting, somthing that women have known about for a long time.

edit : though admittedly her arse (u.k spelling) is amazing, I would certainly enjoy slotting it right up there !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmm, the animation for the girl is pretty bad. Why aren't you guys talking about the water and smoke demos...those look extremely good. Especially the interactive smoke...that's just sick :oops:
 
The thing that bothers me is that she blinks too fast. It's like the eyelids are there one frame and gone the next. They need to add some proper motion blurring.
 
Yeah the smoke demo is awesome, it's a real-time navier-stokes solver on a very high resolution grid. The other cool one is the cascades demo, all of the geometry in that is being generated from a noise seed procedually via geometry shader streamout. That's definately awesome, procedually generated terrain here we come.
 
I wasn't suggesting she was pretty. On the contrary, I can't stand her. I think she looks positively synthetic.

ok, so we agree that shes not worth worrying about then.

And yes, Bring on the smoke demo, its AWE---f**kin--Some,

*stumbles into bed drunk*

ps: just met a load of canadian girls 2nite and all I can say is...... pffft, waste of time. !!
 
Adrienne was pretty much one of Nvidia's worst demo ideas ever.

She's not pretty..if you see the show she's annoying. At least get an proper, attractive model. Or Kate Moss (little dig there).

On top of that the little Adrienne demo linked is completely dumb, and not even graphically impressive, for last gen cards let alone G80.

On top of that went to Anand and a bunch of people are criticizing Nvidia for using a "porn" aka playboy, model. Yeah it surprised me a bit too, but it's just another symptom this marketing thing went awry.
________
EXTREME Q VAPORIZER HEATING ELEMENT
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top