As I said I don't think it's correct to state zero review, maybe if you want to be strictly those of the typical/staple tech outlets.
Test processeur : Intel Core i7-13700, moins bien que ses concurrents : Introduction, page 1
Dans la série des processeurs Intel non-K, après le 13400F et le 13500 quon avait particulièrement apprécié pour leur polyvalence à prix rai... - Introduction, page 1
Those were for 13th gen.
Also again technically if you just set power limits you basically get the non K processors -
![www.techpowerup.com](https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i9-14900k-raptor-lake-tested-at-power-limits-down-to-35-w/images/title.jpg)
Intel Core i9-14900K Raptor Lake Tested at Power Limits Down to 35 W
There's no denying that Intel's Core i9-14900K is a power hog. This article examines the power, performance and thermals effects of limiting its power consumption, with very interesting results. Additionally, we investigate undervolting to determine if efficiency can be optimized even further.
They just aren't that interesting to review or applicable to DIY. Kind of like why not every specific graphics card model gets cited and treated differently in most discourse, and most people just cite say RTX 4090 reviews, as opposed to every specific graphics card model.