For those who have the option, do you choose higher framerates or higher quality?
It's for easy of language. I can't beleive this is coming up again! If we don't use the one word 'quality' to denote per-pixel visual effects, then our list has to consist of "framerate, resolution, or number and type of effects and visual features resulting in better looking individual frames."Why on earth should we consider that more natural and more responsive motion wasn't the ultimate expression of quality?
It's for easy of language. I can't beleive this is coming up again! If we don't use the one word 'quality' to denote per-pixel visual effects, then our list has to consist of "framerate, resolution, or number and type of effects and visual features resulting in better looking individual frames."
The word 'quality' here means that above, and is used just to denote the third option for developers. If you've a better single word that'll mean that without conflicting with other notions of graphics, please present it...
What about fighting games?Stable 30fps is 100% enough for single/coop/pvp games and if someone cant play 30fps games , there is something wrong with their eyes/reflex/adaptibility.
If you've a better single word that'll mean that without conflicting with other notions of graphics, please present it..
I think that the framerate obsession is a recent thing caused by people that want to flame online in console wars and enlarge their e-penis.
It's very interesting that the same poll in the PC space is yielding far more interest in graphics than framerate. That goes completely against the life-long narrative! I know in earlier consoles, they offered 60 fps where home computers and PCs couldn't. It's only the change to 3D where consoles have started to fall behind.