Teasy said:
It doesn't spell it out or say it at all.
Err...okay, Teasy, but I think you're insane.
It mentions the Xbox is doing very poorly in Japan, and mentions the reason why they're doing poorly is because Sony and Nintendo are "entrenched". I don't know about what "entrenched" means in the UK, but here across the pond it implies they're in a solid position...
If its only focused on XBox and PS2 then why does it mention XBox and GC numbers for the U.S then?
It's quite simple. Focused doesn't mean "only about". And to the New York Times' readers, the US numbers matter, while Japanese numbers are somewhat unimportant...
Oh so showing U.S GC, PS2 and XBox numbers is relivant to the article but showing Japanese GC numbers, along with the Japanese XBox and PS2 numbers they showed, isn't relivant?
Is the New York times a US publication or a Japanese publication? I'm so confused.
The article is mainly about Xbox vs PS2, or MS vs Sony. It mentions specifically the current state of the entire console market in North America because, well, the NYT is a North American publication! They only mentioned the PS2 and Xbox numbers for Japan because the specific numbers for the GCN don't mean anything -- it mentions that it's "entrenched" which is all they need to say.
You're really starting to remind me of the kids on the IGN boards, which are actually whining about the Japanese GCN numbers missing, because it's the only region in the world where the GCN is outselling the Xbox. They look high and low for any positive, concrete sign of the GCN's success, and whine when the NYT thinks it's unimportant to their article.
Whine is absolutely the correct word. And yes, I'm whining now, but I've got a reason for it! It's like kindergarten.