ersonally, I find the lack of AA quite disturbing, especially given the relatively low resolution of the LCD screen
What? How do you mean relatively low? 9.5 cm / 480 pixels and 5.4cm / 270 pixels is pretty darn small? What are you comparing it to?
ersonally, I find the lack of AA quite disturbing, especially given the relatively low resolution of the LCD screen
Indeed, dot pitch is way higher than most displays. There are palmtops with higher resolution per square inch though. Perhaps Chisholm works a lot on these?!What? How do you mean relatively low? 9.5 cm / 480 pixels and 5.4cm / 270 pixels is pretty darn small? What are you comparing it to?
Indeed, dot pitch is way higher than most displays.
RAM is the only thing that doesn't get a boost, but i don't think that matters alot for games
Angular resolution is what matters. What is your viewing distance?What? How do you mean relatively low? 9.5 cm / 480 pixels and 5.4cm / 270 pixels is pretty darn small? What are you comparing it to?
Angular resolution is what matters. What is your viewing distance?
Can we just define it as dreamcast level and be happy?
I question how much of a boost the extra 50% clock speed will truly allow though. It's not a generational improvement, so I wonder if the difference will even be noticeable. It's like the difference between the xbox and the cube in raw performance, but minus features, the xbox port of the game never really looked much better. And a geforce ddr to a geforce 2 wasn't a life changing experience either. To me, +50% clock speed means a slightly better framerate as the only noticeable visual change.