Why's it only £50 (and £42 in some places)? That's cheaper than most AAA game yet cost to make must be extravagant. Is this deferring costs to DLC as part of the financial management, because £60-70 is too high for first day sales?
Something to note, this game was available for pre-order dating back to 2014! Only orders made in 2016 are counted towards the ranking AFAIK.
Why's it only £50 (and £42 in some places)? That's cheaper than most AAA game yet cost to make must be extravagant. Is this deferring costs to DLC as part of the financial management, because £60-70 is too high for first day sales?
Thats dumping - if Sony were charging £5 you'd have a point but what is the market value of a game? Fallout 4 cost me £49.99 and the Witcher 3 was £46.99 - both PSN UK day one cost. It's the likes of EA, Activision and Ubisoft that have you thinking that £50 for a AAA game is cheap.I suppose relative profit margins are higher on first party titles so they can compete on price. Doesn't that count as anticompetitive behaviour?
It's good It's really goooooodHe says, not having a PS4 and not playing UC4 and trying to distract everyone else from having their fun...
I suppose relative profit margins are higher on first party titles so they can compete on price. Doesn't that count as anticompetitive behaviour? He says, not having a PS4 and not playing UC4 and trying to distract everyone else from having their fun...
People should be using the spoiler tags. If not, suspend them. It'll give them more time to play!Indeed. Anyone intending to play the game later should avoid this thread. That also means me, meaning I can't really come here to moderate...