I think it's you who confuse terminology Laa-Yosh. Subsurface scattering is a real physical phenomenon, common to all non-metallic materials. It is not an implementation, it is something real that is simulated with different implementations of varying accuracy. If your industry incorrectly uses the term subsurface scattering to refer to a particular implementation of an effect, then you should rather try advocate correcting that misuse, rather than try to get others to also muddle up their terminology to match yours...
IMHO
IMHO