Beyond it's citizens, the ideology at the heart of Chinese Government is the anti-thesis of extraterritoriality (unlike the US). And the reason for this is because it would harm China economically and to a lesser degree, China simply doesn't care what harm comes to people outside of China and who aren't Chinese.Why is this worrisome? Think about all the gaming companies around the world which Tencent either own a majority stake, own outright or own a large controlling interest.
Development houses outside of China may or may not be able to avoid some of the restrictions that China is placing on game development, but anything developed in China most certainly won't. Either Tencent gets those companies to follow China's regulations or bad things could happen to the people at Tencent. That's a lot of pressure on Tencent to exert more control over studios under their umbrella.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...game-studio-behind-hit-nintendo-switch-titles
Tencent Buys Game Studio Behind Hit Nintendo Switch Titles
The Shenzhen-based entertainment giant has taken about a 90% stake in Wake Up Interactive Ltd. for more than 5 billion yen ($44 million), the people said, asking not to be identified because the transaction is not yet public. Wake Up owns Tokyo-based Soleil Ltd., which developed Nintendo Switch hit Ninjala and helped create Travis Strikes Again: No More Heroes. Taking over almost the entire company is unusual for Tencent in Japan, which has so far made smaller investments and mainly aimed to secure international publishing rights for future games
How long until the Chinese government starts trying to impose and control any game companies that Tencent have acquired? Will Tencent be able to shield them from the Chinese government? Will Tencent attempt to divest itself of game companies they've acquired in an attempt to protect them from the Chinese government?
I did respond, which you may have missed, but never. Beyond controlling it's own people China has no extra-territorial policies or laws. It's simply not a concept in their ideology. They make these moves to prevent 'harm' from their own people. They don't care less about non-Chinese people. Arguably, classic Chinese diplomacy of aiding your enemies and competitors in their own demise would suggest they would promote such things outside of China.
China has huge financial interests in Western media, which strengthens their economy, but has never has they exhibited attempt to control the narrative, only the narrative of what is released in China.
I dont know if you are talking about narrative as in WRT games then perhaps thats true (I dont take much notice of games) but if you are talking about narrative in general news then thats plainly not true, theres hardly a day that goes by without me reading some article about the CCP trying to control the narrative about how ppl overseas perceive the CCPChina has huge financial interests in Western media, which strengthens their economy, but has never has they exhibited attempt to control the narrative, only the narrative of what is released in China.
All of these are examples of China applying the law to Chinese nationals (incl. dual-nationals) or in China's jurisdiction - bearing in mind that China considers that 'China' includes, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Tibet etc. Lots of countries have laws that apply extra-territorially to their citizens abroad. The US has a raft of extra-territorial laws that apply to products sold - much further reaching than China. It's when when you buy any Apple or Google product, in those T&C are export restrictions about not taking products to countries the US consider hostile - at least most without US authorisation.And yet despite this, they craft their laws in such a way that they can apply them to people that do not reside in China. Specifically many of the new laws imposed in Hong Kong can be applied to anyone, anywhere in the world. China does not have the power to bring charges against them outside of Chinese territory, however, as soon as they enter China they can then be prosecuted. As well, they have gone after non-Chinese nationals as well.
For example, Chinese-Australian reporter accused of spreading secrets - ABC News (go.com) Much much worse if you are a Taiwanese National, China ‘hunts’ Taiwan nationals through forced deportation: Report | Politics News | Al Jazeera.
I should have been more clear, I am referring to entertainment. A lot of Chinese money pours into Hollywood which is why so many movies are shot with a distinct China-release version in mind. It's not impacting released elsewhere and Beijing know that if they do try to directly influence foreign entertainment media to promote Chinese ideology only, this would not be commercially popular outside of China which undermines the purpose of investing.I dont know if you are talking about narrative as in WRT games then perhaps thats true (I dont take much notice of games) but if you are talking about narrative in general news then thats plainly not true, theres hardly a day that goes by without me reading some article about the CCP trying to control the narrative about how ppl overseas perceive the CCP
The press release does not state that. It could just as well be that it is the seller which demanded that provision. And given that they still do business under the 1C name, I'd say that's the more likely of the two.Oh and Tencent is going to require them to change their name and branding within a few months of the acquisition, damn.
Tencent has acquired a minority stake in Canadian studio Offworld Industries.
My only fear is that Tencent offers Epic/Sweeney a nice deal/sum for the rest of Epic's shares.