Frostbite....
BATTLEFRONT was really good but Battlefield 1 failed in my opinion. From the Battlefield 1 thread:
"After I tested Mass Effect: Andromeda and the soon announcement of STAR WARS Battlefront 2 I wanted to look once again at the tech of Battlefield 1. What I have to say:
I am disgusted be the use of the Frostbite engine in Battlefield 1. They use a negative texture LOD in Battlefield 1 which looks horrible. The lower the resolution the worse it becomes. In 1620p (how I played it with 100fps) it is not as terrible but in FullHD it is a nightmare.
Without a high resolution or SSAA this negative texture LOD is a trick to get more details and a higher AF degree out of the textures but it produces a disgusting flickering and moiré effect. This reminds me of earlier video game days in which games often had no mipmaps, whereby the game shimmered then. The aggressive sharpening also aggravates the situation by a lot.
If the TAA is deactivated all the artifacts become even clearer. Many effects flicker etc. STAR WARS Battlefront and ME: A are quite different. Visually STAR WARS Battlefront is way better than Battlefield 1. I hope Battlefront 2 does not get such an eye cancer artefact rich graphics.
Oversharpening comparison PC vs. PlayStation 4: http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/189259"
Not close at all. If you go back to Battlefield 1 trailers with the In Engine footage disclaimer, you can easily see the actual ingame footage has drastically reduced lighting, shaders and shadows. It's pretty much cutscene footage rendered in engine to get your mouth wet and then the per usual somewhat flatter lighting, less complex gameplay kicks in. Dice has been doing it over and over again since Battlefield 4 and I'm not fooling for it again. That said I believe the gameplay would still be pretty good looking, just not trailer good.
As far as I remember Uncharted 1-3 and TLoU had pre renedered cutsceens too and you said this on Jun 7, 2011 in the Uncharted 3 thread.
"OMG this game looks unbelievable beyond words, the improvements in lighting, effects and animation are astounding. The E3 demo actually felt less exciting than the UC2 E3 demo but technically it's way above it. The trailer however has sent me straight to heaven."
I find it interesting how people change their opinion when their favorite developers do something else. Naughty Dog is using real time cutscenes only since Uncharted 4 if I am not wrong.
Precalculated cutscenes have always bothered me with their pixelated artifacts and 30fps. In general I do not count these as game graphics.
The prequel's robots armies were bloody awful
Stormtroopers were worse. Even <1m Ewoks from the Stone Age could defeat them. Unfortunately, I can not take Strormtroopers seriously. In three movies they have only hit once a character.
Last edited: