Trey Parker and Matt Stone, creators of the crudely animated cartoon hit, issued a quirky statement, filled with references to Scientology and the science-fiction writings of church founder L. Ron Hubbard, suggesting Scientology was behind the scheduling change.
"So, Scientology, you have won THIS battle, but the million-year war for Earth has just begun," the pair wrote.
"Temporarily anozinizing our episode will NOT stop us from keeping Thetans forever trapped in your pitiful man-bodies. Curses and drat! You have obstructed us for now, but your feeble bid to save humanity will fail! Hail Xenu!!!"
You, Sir, are in dire need of some auditing.IgnorancePersonified said:I'm a big sci-fi nut and have quite a libary. Tried to read the series before I knew the tie in with Scientolgy but didn't finish the 1st book. For me it was a swash buckling adventure but not a good read and certaily not good science fiction.
rashly said:I was watching a rerun of South Park last night and after the episode they had a promo for next week's episode where Chef returns. I think the name of the episode is "Chef Returns".
Was this all a joke?
Chalnoth said:Well, after hearing this, I'm sure I can live without Chef on South Park. Damn, what an ass.
And btw, thanks for the article, drpepper. Was a good read. It's pretty amazing just how much money the "Church of Scientology" is pilfering out of people.
Have you actually watched the show much Russ? South Park ≠ "highbrow".RussSchultz said:That's pretty petty, though. I'd like to think their humor was a bit more highbrow than dogging a former colleague who decided he didn't want to participate with them any more.
I'd say it's a question of scale. You don't have any significant number of people signing over their entire fortunes to other churches. Most ministers live rather meager existences, and most churches run on shoestring budgets. Yes, they do need money to function, but at least they don't get people to pay thousands and thousands of dollars for church services. The usual situation is one in which all payments are volunteer.Natoma said:And that's different than any other church.... How?
JBark said:Nope:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/arts/national/2006/03/21/south-park-premiere.html
It only takes them a couple days to make an episode, so this one should be pretty entertaining. I hope it has something to do with Chef getting involved with Scientology. Though turning Chef gay would make for a pretty funny episode as well.
Chalnoth said:I'd say it's a question of scale. You don't have any significant number of people signing over their entire fortunes to other churches. Most ministers live rather meager existences, and most churches run on shoestring budgets. Yes, they do need money to function, but at least they don't get people to pay thousands and thousands of dollars for church services. The usual situation is one in which all payments are volunteer.
I think you would be surpised to find you are incorrectNatoma said:I'm sure if you looked at Christianity as a corporation, it'd be, by far, the richest company in the world many times over.