Ruby Video - HERE! and 2 STUNNING pics :D

[dr3amz]

http://snipurl.com/6504

and the image quality/effects are just stunning to say the least. Heard Nvidia just sold Nalu off to Tesco's, mixed with tomato sauce and herbs!

 

[Tim]

Re: Ruby Video - HERE!

http://snipurl.com/6504

Any mirors, this one is damn slow.

 

[SlmDnk]

Thank you. Can this be linked in other places?

 

[dr3amz]

probably will be soon, i just found that one over at Rage3d

 

[SlmDnk]

Whoa! Low poly + not as impressive as Nalu

 

[QuadPump]

so what.. the environment makes up for the lacluster polygon count...

 

[dr3amz]

i think he's being sarcastic?

Ruby easily contentds with Nalu as a character and at a fraction of the polygon count too.

I'm sure ATI coulda spent xxx,000 polys on her hair if they really needed to, and whilst its nice to look at, what's the practicality of doing that?

If NV had 10 mermaids swimming around with that hair then i'd be impressed.

its gone really quiet here, assume everyone is dl the movie?

 

[QuadPump]

at 56k speeds

 

[dr3amz]

yer, we need a mirror and fast!!!!

wonder how badly this will run on my 9700pro - I don't care that it's slow - i just wanna see that running for real!

 

[Diplo]

Why does anyone care which is the better looking demo? Probably both the 6800 and X800 could render either demo. They're tech demos, and we all know that games never look anything like them (at least, not for a few years). Sure, they're nice to look at (once) but ultimately they're just marketing tools - it's like saying Pepsi's TV ads are better than Cokes. Who cares?

 

[QuadPump]

its a video or techdemo??

 

[Jabbah]

its a video or techdemo??

.mov video

Nive tho, quite good res.

 

[Wunderchu]

its a video or techdemo??

video of the techdemo

 

[QuadPump]

anyone who has the video wanna host it on a faster mirror? or send to me so i can host on super fast host? 10gb bandwith

Jabbah: you got it?

 

[thop]

houston we need more bandwidth!!

i wonder if the demo will run on the 9800? probably not since i read sth. about 3Dc being required.

 

[GameCat]

Ruby looks good but that guy with the goat tee looks *horrible*. No self shadowing, ugly modelling and zombie like skin. You can even clearly make out the artifacts from the texture space blurring used as an attempt to do skin shading. If they could make Ruby's skin look so good, how come they settled for a blurry painted mannequin look for the guy?

 

[QuadPump]

Here is another link which will be available at 9am

http://www.bjorn3d.com/atiresult/RubyDoubleCross.mov

 

[Hanners]

Here is another link which will be available at 9am

http://www.bjorn3d.com/atiresult/RubyDoubleCross.mov

[whine] But that's hooouuuurrrsss away... [/whine]

 

[Jabbah]

anyone who has the video wanna host it on a faster mirror? or send to me so i can host on super fast host? 10gb bandwith

Jabbah: you got it?

I got it but sadly no access to a fast host

Check ur pm

 

[dr3amz]

you're not seeing the full detail of the guy in that shot - look at the detail on his hands for example. there's some close ups on bjorn3d that show close up shots of his face with shader enhancements running and they look very nice indeed.

his lips look as good as rubys for example.

and what `artifacts` do you mean his stubble? lol