RSX: 1.1 billion vertices/sec?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thegameman said:
The most graphicaly impresive game on xbox doesn't look even 1 time better than the most graphicaly impresive PS2 game,it have cleaner picture sharper graphics and more polys,but not to the point were you can say even 2 times better.

You can talk about specs but the final games like GT4 and Forza is what realy show how far is one from the other.

:rolleyes: you haven't seen/played SC:CT... the PS2 version is not even close... but it is still very impressive.
 
blakjedi said:
Thegameman said:
The most graphicaly impresive game on xbox doesn't look even 1 time better than the most graphicaly impresive PS2 game,it have cleaner picture sharper graphics and more polys,but not to the point were you can say even 2 times better.

You can talk about specs but the final games like GT4 and Forza is what realy show how far is one from the other.

:rolleyes: you haven't seen/played SC:CT... the PS2 version is not even close... but it is still very impressive.

Um, so?

You didn't get what he meant, now did you?
 
As far as last gen if you had a TV that supported 480p and a sound system that supported DD 5.1 Xbox over PS2 was a no brainer.

Thats why this gen of gaming is going to be much more entertaining and enjoyable.
 
Unless you happen to like games available on PS2 that aren't available on XB...

Yes very true but there was so many games I didn't get to play this gen i'ts not even funny, must hvae been 30 games on PS2 I was dieing to play that I never even got a chance to and another 20 combined on the Cube and Xbox. Just not enough time to play when you get old and get a job and family.
 
c0_re said:
Unless you happen to like games available on PS2 that aren't available on XB...

Yes very true but there was so many games I didn't get to play this gen i'ts not even funny, must hvae been 30 games on PS2 I was dieing to play that I never even got a chance to and another 20 combined on the Cube and Xbox. Just not enough time to play when you get old and get a job and family.

Amen to that .. its exactly why I never considered xbox. There are a couple of games I want to try on xbox such as NG, but so many more on PS2 that I have not had time to get my hands on (some of which I actually purchased). I will say that I bought a GC simply for Zelda.
 
jonnyp said:
blakjedi said:
Thegameman said:
The most graphicaly impresive game on xbox doesn't look even 1 time better than the most graphicaly impresive PS2 game,it have cleaner picture sharper graphics and more polys,but not to the point were you can say even 2 times better.

You can talk about specs but the final games like GT4 and Forza is what realy show how far is one from the other.

:rolleyes: you haven't seen/played SC:CT... the PS2 version is not even close... but it is still very impressive.

Um, so?

You didn't get what he meant, now did you?

:rolleyes: oh no i got it... and visually sc:ct is twice as good on xbox compared to ps2... not every game but that one is.
 
So given what we know so far (RSX+Cell) Would it be possible to transform 1 billion polys with decent effects and lights @ 60fps?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top