I read this yesterday and the first thing that popped into my head was "can they do that?"
Who get hit with class-actions all the time. If that's true, then it's not worth a can of beans in terms of actual legal binding.Wireless carriers for example.
$50 is often more than most of these people will get if left to the corporations generosity. And there have been cases of large settlements (per class member), if not in consumer electronics.Class actions in general never really benefited the consumer unless they brought about large policy changes. The oh we're sorry for all your trouble here a buck fifty for everyone but the lawyer always seemed kinda pointless.
FYI Corporations win arbitration 95% of the time. It disappoints me still a company would try and strong arm its consumers into something like this. It's about as low as it gets.
You must be disappointed all the time pal.
So I take it you dont use the microsoft windows OS [zing]and I continue to support the companies that take care of me instead of treating me like a criminal or trying to take away buyer rights because of something they put into a TOS.
Who get hit with class-actions all the time. If that's true, then it's not worth a can of beans in terms of actual legal binding.
Not at all. Fortunately, as a consumer I can choose with my buying power, and I continue to support the companies that take care of me instead of treating me like a criminal or trying to take away buyer rights because of something they put into a TOS.
We want to let you know that we have detected attempts on Sony Entertainment Network, PlayStation Network and Sony Online Entertainment (“Networks”) services to test a massive set of sign-in IDs and passwords against our network database. These attempts appear to include a large amount of data obtained from one or more compromised lists from other companies, sites or other sources. In this case, given that the data tested against our network consisted of sign-in ID-password pairs, and that the overwhelming majority of the pairs resulted in failed matching attempts, it is likely the data came from another source and not from our Networks. We have taken steps to mitigate the activity.
Less than one tenth of one percent (0.1%) of our PSN, SEN and SOE audience may have been affected. There were approximately 93,000 accounts globally (PSN/SEN: approximately 60,000 accounts; SOE: approximately 33,000) where the attempts succeeded in verifying those accounts’ valid sign-in IDs and passwords, and we have temporarily locked these accounts. Only a small fraction of these 93,000 accounts showed additional activity prior to being locked. We are currently reviewing those accounts for unauthorized access, and will provide more updates as we have them. Please note, if you have a credit card associated with your account, your credit card number is not at risk. We will work with any users whom we confirm have had unauthorized purchases made to restore amounts in the PSN/SEN or SOE wallet.
As a preventative measure, we are requiring secure password resets for those PSN/SEN accounts that had both a sign-in ID and password match through this attempt. If you are in the small group of PSN/SEN users who may have been affected, you will receive an email from us at the address associated with your account that will prompt you to reset your password.
...
An Important Message From Sony’s Chief Information Security Office:
http://blog.us.playstation.com/2011...rom-sonys-chief-information-security-officer/
Actually, that seems a bit unfair, at least just going from Sony's own words in the above posted quote, as it appears they weren't completely caught with their pants down this time.I'm seeing this getting reported in a "here we go again" kind of way on a lot of blogs