Rare keeps franchises

Discussion in 'Console Industry' started by Ozymandis, Sep 21, 2002.

  1. aneep

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Malaysia
    Quincy

    Fund Q funded development that i know (i dunno why Nin fans here didn't mention them)
    Genius Sonority-founded by a programmer of DQVII
    GDS-Square-Nintendo funded-GBA and GC

    is Namco's Star Fox Armada and Sega's Fzero really under this programme though?
    since i see their involvement as a part of the Triforce deal
    Nintendo also have some kind of deal with Bandai to develop for GC, 5 games announced so far (something involving WSC in Europe)

    if that's all they have though, its definitely being dwarfed by the devs supported under MS Incubator and another MS programme (similar to incubator) in Japan

    -aneep-
     
  2. CaptainHowdy

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2002
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    MS has only developed 7 Xbox games inhouse.
    they have published some games for nobody third parties, but that does not go towards the first party publications.

    as far as fund Q, your point was that your calling Nintendo a liar for saying the Rare money is going towards new talent, because you just can not deal with the fact Nintendo has been the only company so far that hasnt left a knee deep pile of s@#t behind them everywhere they go(unlike M$).

    Fund Q has founded the company behind Animal Leader(Cubivore), the company behind is a Nintendo affiliate, headed by none other than Miyamotos right hand man for the last 15 years.

    it also started game designers Studio with Square to bring Square games back to Nintendo

    it helped form Zoonami with Ex Rare Members(I am sure you remember this bunch, you started a trolling post once, because you were SO SURE at the time it was a good stab at Nintendo before knowing it was a Nintendo exclusive company).

    mostly, its in house teams that are nameless , bringing on lots of new employees will bring on results, like say....putting out more first party titles per year? like they have done....

    Maybe if you took your head out of your !@# for more than 5 minutes, you would see it..
     
  3. Qroach

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,868
    Likes Received:
    49
    Teasy,

    Don't try and tell me they are still different games. This is completely different form what you were saying before. You were once saying that Phantasy star 2 was the only version coming to XBox. When actually it will be the exact same version of phantasy star 1&2 that are heading to xbox as they are the GC. version 1 on the GC will not be different. I don't see why you can't admit that.

    Look, all I'm doing is approaching this with similar logic you did. Whatever money nintendo got from the sale is a drop in the barrel to the cash they aready had. Kameo, Perfect dark 0, Diddy king racing and whatever else Nintendo hand them working on. looks to me like they lost more than just two games for the long haul, which is more important then one holiday season. Also, as I said before, wait until X02 to see another annoucement for a title that may be out this fall. Something they've been waiting to annouce for a while.

    You can nit pick on the details all you want Teasy, it won't change thing much in the end. Why should anyone listen to yourself for that matter? You don't have any information about this other than what you read on the internet. Anyway, as I said before, I won't be surprised if this is exactly what happened.


    I said it could come this year, not that it was 100% going to happen. Either way, i expect something to be shown at X02 later this month.


    Obviously you are not sure about that. Do you really have ny idea to what extent nintendo was invloved with all thier projects? I don't see how that statement makes sense. You're judging them by every game rare made on the N64, yet not every game Nintendo helped with? So nitnendo didn't help them with any games on the N64? That doesn't make sense.

    To tell the truth, this just seems like your way of saying Rare sux without nintendo being involved. Which is total BS if you ask me.

    IMO, Rare's been making polished games long before Nitnendo bought a part of that company. I don't think that has changed. We'll see if I'm right when Starfox adventures is in stores.
     
  4. Qroach

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,868
    Likes Received:
    49
    That statement is totally foolish. For one thing i haven't called Nintendo a "liar", I just said why would you believe them that they are going to use this money for future development when they have 7 billion lying around that could have done that long before. Imo, nintendo saying that exactly is just damage control specifically designed to make people like yourself feel better about the situation. Just like the comment "our relationship with Rare has not changed" when it indeed has.

    Logically speaking (what you are NOT doing right now), why didn't Nintendo just use money they already had to fund new developement and partnerships? why wait until now?


    Got a link that says that? Animal leader came out on the n64 did it not? long before Fund-Q was availbile.

    That's still not "shit loads" of games like you claimed. I think you exagerate WAY too much!
     
  5. CaptainHowdy

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2002
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are starting to sound like Bill Clinton(depends on what your definition of "is' is....)

    "I am not calling NIntendo al liar, just dont know why you would believe them.."

    uhm, to not believe them, is to accuse them of telling a lie.....


    they say they are going to do it, they will, they dont like to LOSE money, spending the billions is spending profits, now they have money that is pretty much free and clear...and its enough to get quite a few games.

    its just a fact, deal with it
     
  6. Johnny Awesome

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2002
    Messages:
    2,806
    Likes Received:
    737
    Location:
    Windsor, ON
    :roll:

    Nintendo will do nothing as usual. When are Nintendo fans going to wake up and realize that the Gamecube is EXTREMELY light on games. Losing Rare isn't going to help matters. Certainly not in the short term, and they haven't demonstrated a willingness to buy a lot of content in the past. Why would they change their minds now?

    I mean, look at TGS - good Xbox support and almost nothing for Gamecube. And that's in MS's worst territory...
     
  7. PC-Engine

    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    6,799
    Likes Received:
    12
    I see a lot of PC games being ported to Xbox and the majority of all the games are EXTREMELY mediocre. Also you should check out the release schedule for GC..there's nothing exremely light about it. Of course the Xbox zealots will continue to paint this bleak picture for GC even predicted Nintendo will become a software only outfit :lol:

    Here's something for the Xbox zealots to chew on:

    Sony's PlayStation 2 and Nintendo's GameBoy Advance systems continue to fight for supremacy of the Japanese market. While sales of the PlayStation 2 outpaced Nintendo's handheld by nearly 2:1 earlier this year, the weekly sales gap between the platforms has shrunk considerably. Cumulative year-to-date sales for the PlayStation 2 however are still significantly higher than the GameBoy Advance, totaling 2.72 million and 1.81 million respectively. The figures below reflect hardware sales from September 5-11 as tracked by Japanese research agency Media Create.

    PlayStation 2 - 44,800
    GameBoy Advance - 31,200
    GameCube - 21,300
    Xbox - 4200
    PSone - 3200
    WonderSwan Crystal - 1900
    WonderSwan Color - 1100
    GameBoy Color - 810
    WonderSwan - 120
    GameBoy - 47
    Nintendo 64 - 43
    PocketStation - 22
     
  8. iscariot

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Messages:
    202
    Likes Received:
    0
    in regards to JA's comments, Gamecube has been doing fine without any Rare games released as of yet and considering the GC lineup is getting stronger each day, I doubt the absense of a company that has been all but stripped from it's core talent that has not released a succesful game in years will make much of an impact on GC's success, or even xb's for that matter...
     
  9. Brimstone

    Brimstone B3D Shockwave Rider
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    1,835
    Likes Received:
    11
    I really don't see how the money Nintendo gets from the sale of Rare helps them that much. They already had plenty of money before the sale of Rare.
     
  10. Ozymandis

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Maryland
    Exactly. What Nintendo needs is a wider variety of exclusive (quality) games to be competitive in the market, not more money. Losing Rare is not helpful unless they use the money to secure these games.

    The big weakness of Nintendo's console is that there simply isn't a wide range of games, at least not quality ones. That's why I'll take my Ps2 every time :D
     
  11. Qroach

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,868
    Likes Received:
    49
    :roll: how does this sound. I could care less about japan. Not only that it has nothing to do with this thread...
     
  12. PC-Engine

    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    6,799
    Likes Received:
    12
    M$ cares and that's what matters and getting Rare isn't going to make the situation better for M$ anytime soon not even in the US :wink:
     
  13. Qroach

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,868
    Likes Received:
    49
    You're really fooling yourself if you don't think Rare will help MS outside of Japan.
     
  14. PC-Engine

    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    6,799
    Likes Received:
    12
    By the time they release something which won't be until 2004 at the earliest, Nintendo would've already be waaayy ahead in terms of sales on a global scale :wink:

    Also as already mentioned, the majority of talent has already been stripped from Rare.
     
  15. Qroach

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,868
    Likes Received:
    49
    We'll see...

    That's not true at all. This is a typical excuse used by people that want to justify nintendo selling off their shares. Just look at starfox adventures and that will show you they have plenty of talent left.
     
  16. Brimstone

    Brimstone B3D Shockwave Rider
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    1,835
    Likes Received:
    11
    Getting Rare has a lot of long term potential for Microsoft. They get a well established company that took years to build up. You just can't build a 250 development house overnight. I think the biggest thing M$ gets is a good developer to help with the X-Box 2. Sure getting some games for the X-Box is nice, but if the X-Box 2 fails then Microsoft entrance into the console market will have been a big waste.
     
  17. CaptainHowdy

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2002
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    is that why Starfox Adventures average review score now is a 5/10???


    and let me run something by you Q
    a while back in the RARE GOING THIRD PARTY DEBATES
    you said that Nintendo did not have enough of a stake in Rare to
    tell them what systems they could develope for, are you changing your stance on that? because, MS is in the same position, they dont actually OWN rare, they just own Nintendos 49%, and as you once said, that isnt a controlling stake..
    (this is the part where you come up with some BS so that you can make it look like MS is going to shine because of this transaction..)
     
  18. Qroach

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,868
    Likes Received:
    49
    Sure it has. got any proof? If you really believe that, then I've lost all respect for you as a gamer. This is nothing more than the typical statement "Rare sux and they aren't what they once were, that's why nintendo is happy to get rid of them" BS I'd expect from you!


    MS doesn't ONLY own nintendo's 49 %. To tell the company what to do you needed at least 51% of the shares. Which is exactly the reason the stampers could do what they wanted. MS also owns the stampers 51%. They bought everything. In other words, they own the controlling share or all the shares in this case. You need to get your facts straight and read about this, and stop being such a fanboi.
    (this is the part where you ignore all reason and try to find some BS to argue becuase you simply don't want to be proved wrong. If you can't find anythign to argue, you'll resort to more name calling... as usual...)
     
  19. Steve Dave Part Deux

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Montana
    I don't recall any mention of the Stampers' or any other parties shares exchanging hands.
     
  20. Guest

    Guest Guest

    darnit, didnt anyone actually read thru the fricking press release?

    Interesting part if you will.
    Sounds like Nintendo believe they will be better off without RARE and 250m pound richer. Well, I cant fault this belief since GC is looking a better system than N64 ever was. :oops:
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...