hey69 said:time that UK joins the freakin EU I would say! 8)
akira888 said:And on Kyro:
What matters is that PVR built an ASIC that was more silicon-efficent than any other GPU released at that time. To blame them for STM's piss-poor marketing and distribution of Series 3 is somewhat unfair.
Teasy said:But anyway I'm not going to take this thread further off topic by posting the big reply I had written Instead I'm taking this discussion to PM's.
That implies that everyone in Europe actually knows how Europe works in its intricacies. I know i don't fully know the details, and i've studied it for years, both in Italy and here. I don't even think big names in politics know everything there is to know...hey69 said:I'm myself from Belgium
marconelly! said:Eh... unless you think UK is somehow it's own continent, it's part of the Europe, yes. That's what they are teaching us in the schools in the rest of the world.
london-boy said:Enough EU talk, what i wanted to know is, first of all, why was DM's thread locked? The one about PSP having 32MB Ram, therefore making it even more expensive. It was a VERY good scoop. I guess it was ruined by the usual bickering... Well, either way, can we talk about it on this thread instead, without all the fighting?
Didn't you just answer your own "why did it get locked" question?london-boy said:It was a VERY good scoop. I guess it was ruined by the usual bickering... Well, either way, can we talk about it on this thread instead, without all the fighting?
EA just said on their conference call they expect Sony to price PSP at $199-249 with software at $39.99. A release date of November or perhaps early December and for Sony to ship 3m by March 2005.
edit:
Also from EA call. Expect 8-12 PSP titles (from EA) in fiscal year (to March 31 2005), existing franchises, features that'll make the compelling, hopefully. R&D costs higher than GB, $1-2m per title range.
Expect margins to be better than GB since it isn't a cartridge format but haven't seen Sony's model yet. Really bullish on platform.
Wont hurt Sony since they are making a profit outta hardware.
Paul said:Wont hurt Sony since they are making a profit outta hardware.
And again, you cannot state this like it's fact. SCEJ doesn't want to let anyone know they may be taking losses per unit sold, it's not good news for investors EVER. Do you really think they would let Deering announce to the world "Hey, yea, we plan to bleed out of our asses with PSP hardware for upwards of 3 years, we hope to make it back.
Time will tell, until E3; just wait IMO.
Am not taking it like fact, just heeding what was said by a high up Sony dude in a past interview. So Deering is faking it? Hmm?
There is no SCEJ only SCEI
i think their investors know their past projects are to be taking losses early on, so PSP taking losses wont surprise them.
ACUTALLY, EA estimated 199-249 is pretty conservative.
From what I've heard, they are planning on having at least baseline PDA functionality with the device, and since they use PalmOS pretty exclusively they may well have a variant in there (or at least something made to look and function similarly, and swap data between easily).chapban. said:I be thinking, like Faf said, throw in a PalmOS, upped the memory and stay it as 299(not that it may be 299 originally even), include 2 batteries. It be really cool to attract more tech people. Wont hurt Sony since they are making a profit outta hardware.