Open Source codec > MPEG-2

Dirac's been around for a while. Shows a lot of promise, although don't expect 'better than MPEG4' stuff, because motion comp makes up a larger part of the compression than the frame packing, so wavelet vs. DCT isn't necessarily a big win.

Best news is the desire to make it patent free - and the BBC have a reasonably big stick in this respect since they have a slice of the MPEG pie already.
 
Isn't wavelet compression extremely processing-intensive?

Harddrives are cheap and broadband is fast these days, so if movies packed with wavelet compression can't run on most systems then what's the point. It's not a win then, it's a big loss.
 
Guden Oden said:
Isn't wavelet compression extremely processing-intensive?
I guess that may depend on which wavelet you chose but, in my experience, it's quite the opposite.

Anyway, the expensive/tricky part is the motion compensation - at least in the compression side of the codec.
 
Back
Top