What bias? The only bias I have is against a fool who drags the entire tone of internet journalism down.
I don't wholly agree with his tone either, but that hardly makes him a fool. Frankly, if you want to look at fools, there are quite a few out there in more distinguished places. Folks who don't fact check, or who are surprised by things like the P4's well documented replay mechanism.
Sure he gets the odd thing right. I could do the same with a couple of dodgy sources and enough random predictions.
Charlie was the first or one of the first to write about AMD/ATI, AMD and Abu Dhabi, quite a few Intel related things, the packaging problems for GT200, etc.
He's gotten a lot right. He's gotten stuff wrong too, but that's what happens when you make predictions.
I wrote an analysis of what I thought CSI would be, and the reality is that I was 95% correct, but I totally missed the boat on current mode signaling. That hardly makes me a moron.
If you can do better than Charlie, then perhaps you should start writing and making predictions. I know Charlie very well and there's no way that I could do better than him - he has amazing sources, and a lot of the info he seems he never writes about.
But most of the rubbish his spews is plain hate filled drivel. Be it for NV or Microsoft.
He does have an axe to grind against both of them (from your perspective, although I'd also agree to some extent). All that means is that as an educated reader you should take what he says about those two companies with a grain of salt. I don't believe everything Charlie says, but I definitely listen/read carefully.
Maybe it's just obvious that someone who runs a website like AMDzone or nvnews has a bias...but frankly, everyone has a bias, even myself.
And people who discount what Charlie says are doing so because of a bias that I (and most others) perceive to be irrational.
David
