Yeah but it certainly can't be any worse than a legacy architecture can it?
NVIDIA: Beyond G80...
- Thread starter kyetech
- Start date
Yeah but it certainly can't be any worse than a legacy architecture can it?
non optimized drivers running on new hardware benchmarking showoff code? I'm afraid most of it will be a dissapointment..
Heh but that would apply across the board and not just to mid-range cards
True, but I don't think the focus on the first two quarters of dx10 is anything about low-end and midrange.. or do you actually WANT to run something like Crysis or, god forbid, Unreal Tournament on a lowly mid-range card? I think it will be a crying game for most people that assume that their mid-range dx10 cards are that much faster than their older high-end cards.
icecold1983
Banned
the arrow texture right in front of the half circle with the nadeo sign
icecold1983
Banned
http://download.yousendit.com/9CA3A04B553836F7
http://download.yousendit.com/F4C3B42A0DEA62CF
sorry about yousendit, didnt know where else to host.
http://download.yousendit.com/F4C3B42A0DEA62CF
sorry about yousendit, didnt know where else to host.
I present to you.. 8600 Ultra! and a bunch of others
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=130015
Thats about it, the return of the ultra moniker?
This could potentially indicate that the 8800ultra might exist waiting for the R600.
Or this could all be hoax.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=130015
Thats about it, the return of the ultra moniker?
This could potentially indicate that the 8800ultra might exist waiting for the R600.
Or this could all be hoax.
That chinese website lists it as G83. Too bad no such thing exists...
I also find it amusing that they predict lower clock speeds for what should be the mid-end offering, when that one is most likely on the 80GT process node, while the low-end would likely be on G instead. FWIW, that was one of the ways NVIDIA got from from 430MHz for G70 to 650MHz for G71, afaik.
As for G84 and G86, you'd assume at least one of those two (probably G84!) is using GDDR4. Any leak which doesn't take that into consideration is most likely random bullshit, sorry to disappoint.
Uttar
I also find it amusing that they predict lower clock speeds for what should be the mid-end offering, when that one is most likely on the 80GT process node, while the low-end would likely be on G instead. FWIW, that was one of the ways NVIDIA got from from 430MHz for G70 to 650MHz for G71, afaik.
As for G84 and G86, you'd assume at least one of those two (probably G84!) is using GDDR4. Any leak which doesn't take that into consideration is most likely random bullshit, sorry to disappoint.
Uttar
That chinese website lists it as G83. Too bad no such thing exists...
I also find it amusing that they predict lower clock speeds for what should be the mid-end offering, when that one is most likely on the 80GT process node, while the low-end would likely be on G instead. FWIW, that was one of the ways NVIDIA got from from 430MHz for G70 to 650MHz for G71, afaik.
As for G84 and G86, you'd assume at least one of those two (probably G84!) is using GDDR4. Any leak which doesn't take that into consideration is most likely random bullshit, sorry to disappoint.
Uttar
Scalar ALU Clocks weren't a factor in G73 and NV43...
I would think its 192bit seeing the latest trend of things.
Whatever truth might be, i would like to see the "ultra" moniker back. Sounds so cool.
That wouldn't mesh with the rumored memory amounts. I seriously doubt we'll see any 192-bit memory bus parts.
The site is saying that it will have 256bit memory bus.
Ah, thanks. Makes sense. That'll be some pretty beastly hardware for the $200 mark, if true.
Fixed.
It sure does sound like a beast. The mid range nVIDIA legacy continues? i think so.