my point is how much would they have to cut the price to make the value proposition greater than the perceived value of xos or pro?The higher your margins are, the more you can afford to drop prices if need be. So i dont really understand your argument? Unless you mean that stockholders dont like making less money but the same rule applies to Microsoft. Xbox Division is not allowed to gobble up MS financials forever
Anyways, IHS calculated that the Xbox One S BOM is 24 dollars more than the latest Xbox One SKU. This is primarily because of the 2x more expensive BD
Unless GDDR5 prices are exactly the same as in 2013, i see Sony having more room to adjust prices since they skipped the 4k BD, even in 2013 their blu ray drive was cheaper because it was inhouse manufactured
could they cut that much regardless how much it costs in relation to the xo to make.
that's not including things like share holders etc, I'm sure most would understand not making as much when playing catch up on hardware, compared to when your ahead.