Authorities in egypt have denied the BIOchemist had anything to do with the bombs. And considering the proficiency they have in the use of torture on prisoners, one has to assume they've interrogated him VEEEERY thoroughly...Powderkeg said:
new London attacks?
- Thread starter epicstruggle
- Start date
Latest
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4705933.stm
May not have been 'dummy' attacks ...
"Three of the devices are the same size and weight as those used for the 7 July London bombings. The same chemicals also appear to have been used."
"As on 7 July, the bombs are believed to have been carried in rucksacks. Three are thought to have been of a similar size to the previous bombs, while the fourth was smaller and appeared to have been contained in a plastic box.
It is thought the detonators went off, causing small blasts, but failed to detonate the bombs themselves. The bombers managed to flee. "
"Some said the attackers seemed "scared" or "surprised" when their bombs failed to explode properly.
Oval attack witness Kate Reid describe hearing a "pop" as if a big balloon had burst before seeing a young, dark-skinned man with a bag at his feet looking "really scared". "
"There is one report of a suspect trying to use a handgun to detonate explosives in a rucksack"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4705933.stm
May not have been 'dummy' attacks ...
"Three of the devices are the same size and weight as those used for the 7 July London bombings. The same chemicals also appear to have been used."
"As on 7 July, the bombs are believed to have been carried in rucksacks. Three are thought to have been of a similar size to the previous bombs, while the fourth was smaller and appeared to have been contained in a plastic box.
It is thought the detonators went off, causing small blasts, but failed to detonate the bombs themselves. The bombers managed to flee. "
"Some said the attackers seemed "scared" or "surprised" when their bombs failed to explode properly.
Oval attack witness Kate Reid describe hearing a "pop" as if a big balloon had burst before seeing a young, dark-skinned man with a bag at his feet looking "really scared". "
"There is one report of a suspect trying to use a handgun to detonate explosives in a rucksack"
Gerry said:
Mmm... 4 bombs failing to detonate properly... I dont call that "luck". I call that "stupidity" on the part of whoever made the bombs. He obviously made a booboo somewhere and the things didn't work.
What worries me is that someone was ready to kill again only 2 weeks after the last blitz. Now THAT is worrying, cause it means it's going to happen again soon, and next time the guy will read the instructions properly and the idiots will kill a lot of people. Again.
Well, if i needed a real reason to move city.......
yeah looks like he was another suicide bomber. wow.nutball said:
Errr... That's assassination worth of the Mafia. Highly doubtful the police would do something like that.
Errr... That's assassination worth of the Mafia. Highly doubtful the police would do something like that. We're not in Texas afterall.
nutball said:
Well if they really pushed him to the floor and jumped on him, i don't see how shooting him 5 times would be needed. We don't know the dynamics obviously but it does sound a bit strange to me.
The BBC is probably picking up passengers coming out of the station, getting their story, which is bound to be warped anyway.
exactly. a press of a button and there goes everyone around him.nutball said:
epic
epicstruggle said:
Did the guy have a bomb on him?! another one? today?
oh.
How often do police shoot someone in the UK, rarely right? I think its safe to assume that police were following this person and when it looked like he might be a suicide bomber, they took action before he could detonate his bomb. Now, this is just speculation on my part, but im pretty sure the police over there rarely ever even carry firearms.london-boy said:
epic
I must agree with Dildo here. I wouldn't shoot someone with bombs. Though i'm sure they know better.
In the end you know what shooting a muslim guy means, right?
If he's the wrong guy, that means more bombs in retaliation.
If he's the right guy, that means more bombs in retaliation.
If he's the wrong guy, that means more bombs in retaliation.
If he's the right guy, that means more bombs in retaliation.
