This is a straw man argument.
The Surface Book being an unique product does not invalidate the fact that spending money, volume and power budget on a discrete GPU just to cripple it with 1GB of VRAM is ridiculous.
Even more when it's supposed to render to a 3000*2000 screen.
It uses a GTX 960m (GM107), it isn't going to run a game at native resolution that uses more than 1 GB of memory at anything more than a crawl even if it had 8 GB of GDDR5 memory. A GTX 960m struggles to run a game well at 1080p at medium to high settings with 4 GB of memory. At the quality setting it needs to run well 1080p it likely isn't even really using more than 1 GB of assets. Push it harder to where it can use 2 or 4 GB? And your game likely slows to a crawl anyway.
More memory isn't going to do diddly squat in most cases for games with the level of dedicated GPU they used. And if they used something powerful enough to take advantage of higher amounts of memory, you'll likely see the battery life take a massive hit.
Again, it's not a strawman, this speaks directly to the purpose and design of the machine. It's an ultra-portable laptop that also happens to be an incredibly light 13.5" tablet which also happens to have really good battery life.
It is NOT a desktop gaming machine replacement "laptop" that gets but 10 hour battery life. It can't support a heftier GPU that would required beefier cooling in order to properly take advantage of more graphics memory and still offer basically all day battery life.
I don't understand. Its a USB 3.0 port you can just get a usb type c wire and plug in any of those devices ?
I'm upset with the lack of usb c for charging
anyway I told my gf about the surface pro 4 and she said well maybe we will get one. I got a maybe !
There are plenty of reasons.
It allows for power currents up to 3.0 A, double that of your standard USB 3.0 connectors, allowing the use of more power hungry external drives without the need to have those drives plugged into a separate power source. It would also allow for quick charging of mobile devices that supported it (like the Lumia 950) in emergencies.
It allows for the possibility of routing DisplayPort though it. Potentially removing the need to have a dedicated display out port on the machine.
It can offer Thunderbolt support allowing use of those devices.
It supports Ethernet as well as PCIExpress.
It's also significantly smaller than the full sized USB 3.0 ports on the Surface Pro 4. One of the reasons the device couldn't be made thinner is because of those ports. Personally I'd rather have had 2x USB Type C connectors with adapters for full sized USB 3.0 devices.
Like I said, I understand why it was chosen, I just find it disappointing they weren't more forward looking with regards to their USB ports.
Hell, the Surface Book at 7.7 mm thick obviously can't support full sized USB 3.0, thus it has absolutely no USB ports on the tablet section. If they had used USB Type C, they could have had USB ports both on the tablet as well as the keyboard dock.
Regards,
SB