true, I wouldnt be breaking out the champagne just yet comparing ipad vs surface numbers let alone revenue'sit's unlikely the SP will grow enough to exceed iPad sales. The ASP is simply much higher
True but the tradeoff is weight and still the fan? so that it's not quite as light for tablet use. In fact, if you detach the tablet, the battery life is poor or is that only the Surface Book not the Pro?
Anandtech A9x vs x86 comparison should be redone, since AT chose a compiler known to be tuned for SPEC and compiled for 32-bit x86 which 403.gcc and 429.mcf go significantly faster.Also the entry level SP4 is now powered by a Core M3, which according to recent benchmarks over at anand is for the most part a slightly faster CPU than the A9X in the iPad Pro.
Fair points, still I think they are at least very close with A9X impressing me a bit more because of the process disadvantage and better GPU. I also forgot to add the point of my quoting the above being that the Core M3 SP4 is fanless, so that complaint is gone at least for the lower end model which has comparable performance to the iPad Pro (also fanless).
P.S. First post on my new Surface Book (entry level, I'm not that rich). It's a nice device so far that actually brings advantages over my desktop aside from portability. Up until now I've never been fond of laptops because they always proved to be all about sacrifices with only that one selling point of portability. The SB is definitely a different beast.
P.P.S. I usually despise touch pads, but this one is damn good and I am actually finding myself liking it more than a mouse in some ways.
Apparently it's just a 965M http://www.theverge.com/circuitbrea...ft-upgraded-surface-book-16-hour-battery-life